That was on a Royal electric with a wider platen and a couple of gears in the guts to allow the machine the cycle times needed to keep up with me ~ contest deck!
So, what do I remember? Well, you're typing along on some-body's crummy Royal used by 5 or 6 different people per day, for years and years, the paper starts slipping and next thing you know you've typed in a curve. With multipart forms ~ with several sheets ~ that would happen all the time.
Now, sit that same typewriter somewhere in a nurses station in a birthing facility and you'll have baby oil, coffee, talcum powder, and who knows what else floating in, pouring in, smearing in ~ and those pieces of paper of whatever kind will twist, and turn and slide around.
The straightest typing that includes all the information they'd have BEFORE BIRTH is typed on a different machine from the one recording information they'd have AFTER BIRTH. That material is straighter and could have been added in from a worksheet ~ although one of our analysts says there's a suggestion that someone with oil or serum on their hand did handle the form. For all we know this thing could have been sitting there beside the mother during the birth. There's another thing taking place we don't see here ~ the taking of the footprints and the baby crying and peeing all over the place. It's possible we could get a DNA sample from any bodily fluid residues and match that up with Obama!
Understanding the ordinary quality of individuals brought in with the Obama Regime there's no way they suspected "THE ONE" would be subjected to such in depth scrutiny. They can't even imagine it after they've been told.
I can see Gibbs in my minds eye trying to put down the idea of checking some of Obama's infant urine residue for DNA ~ and that it's possible it could still be around (possibly useful).
If you could do 238 wpm I’m in awe! I took typing in high school because I was smitten with a cutie (don’t even remember her name now) and typing was the only class I could sign up for that she was in as well. Never got anywhere with the girl, my knowing how to type did keep me out of the rice paddies and behind a gun-metal grey Steelcase desk with a big clunky Underwood to pound on all day. Usually could manage 50-60 wpm with few errors. (I once in the seventies chatted up a lass at a typing service across from campus while she was finishing up a term paper for me, and was stunned at how fast she was typing - she claimed over 200 wpm, and I believe her. Fingers flying!!!)
I still, looking at the BC, don’t see any reason why the person or persons typing it would have had any reason to adjust the paper in the carriage after “Kapiolani” or after “BARACK” in box 8. Indeed, the horizontal line below “Kapiolain” starts to curve down while “Kapiolani” itself above it continues straight, even if you expand it and place a straight-edge at the bottom of the serifs. This suggests to me that it was typed on a form copied from a book, scrubbed of the original data, and then filled out by someone who was taking pains to make it appear to have been typed on a flat form which appeared later to be curved because of the artiface of copying from a bound volume.
Anyway, glad to see some folks who know what the’re about are on the case.