It’s interesting insight that this is what is tossed at conservatives who will not vote for Mitt. Says a lot about the mentality of those people, IMO. “Temper Tantrum”. Is that what they really think? Really? Losing it over nothing?
I guess it is true that for them, Mitt really can’t do anything wrong, they will vote for him no matter what. I bet Mitt could praise Obama (he did - “he’s a nice guy”) and still they’d vote for him. All I know is Obama’s core believes the same thing about him.
“It’s interesting insight that this is what is tossed at conservatives who will not vote for Mitt. Says a lot about the mentality of those people, IMO. “Temper Tantrum”. Is that what they really think? Really? Losing it over nothing?”
Bear in mind who they are. Virtually every one is a lickspittle partei-uber-alles hack, who will perform as commanded, or a credulous cultist who will also perform as commanded. They dare not even think for themselves, thus they all sound alike - as do their mirror images in the Democrat party.
Temper tantrum sounds about right to me.
I guess it is true that for them, Mitt really can’t do anything wrong, they will vote for him no matter what. I bet Mitt could praise Obama (he did - “he’s a nice guy”) and still they’d vote for him. All I know is Obama’s core believes the same thing about him.I don't know where you get this nonsense. A lot of us are not saying Mitt can't do anything wrong but are saying the choice between Obama and Romney is pretty stark.
That you can't see that is not a surprise to me as you seem to belong to the crowd that doesn't think Romney can do anything right and are willing to keep perhaps the worst president every in office while you throw your temper tantrum.
But I know I can't change you so help yourself but your lame justification just doesn't fly.