Replies

“I’d like to see your evidence that SAD was in Seattle in 1961. Interviews with old friends, some of whose stories changed, don’t count. And David has thoroughly taken apart the U of WA transcript, so that doesn’t count.” David has done no such thing, IMO, as I personally contested his analysis. The U of HI cross-corroborates the U of WA on the 1961 U of WA courses and they both confirm a Mercer HS graduation in 1960. All of that is solid, verifiable (can be repeatedly verified by others at any time) documentary evidence, plus you've got Polk with a “good enough” variant of SADOs name NEVER associated with an alleged mystery “other wife” of BHO Sr....the alleged mother of Roman Obama. Against this David has only offered his personal speculation about how particularly one of several U of WA docs “should” look.

Really you did no such thing--your response was to call me a liar which is just fine, you are certainly welcome to do that.

Facts are, as I told you, I was sitting there writing you with a handful of actual 1961 original entry transcripts from the U of W lying on my desk next to my monitor; I had and have first hand knowledge of the security entry system which was designed to keep students from modifying academic records in any way which required use of the form actually in place in 1961. The form the U furnished Corsi had two binder pin holes; the actual form had 21; the actual form was designed not to be removed but to be completed in handwriting and delivered in the form of a photocopy of the original document on which the U stamped a certification where a certified transcript was required; the actual original was three column, not two; etc. There really isn't any doubt that the form they furnished Corsi is fraudulent.

Matter of fact I sent Corsi a sample of the true form and I believe he has shown it to one or two other people.

I am not going to post a copy here at the moment because although I redacted the forms I sent Jerry, there is enough information on them that a determined person with access to all the records could reconstruct who the student was and I am not interested in making that information available at the moment.

In the real world of controversy, if you are going to say I contested something--you say well here is a sample of the form; here is the provenance of that form demonstrating that the Stanley exhibit is in fact the real thing.

It's fine to call me a liar but I delivered a real sample and enough people here on the board know me that I can afford not to be concerned whether you believe me or not; nor frankly, am I very concerned about having you call me names.

I do think you ought to lay off the nasty antagonistic emotional attack on Fred--Fred does a lot of work; it's very effective; Fred has uncovered a number of the gaps in zero's story and has found a number of facts that suggest what really happened. For the most part, I think people here on the board really appreciate Fred's efforts.

I intend to provide a more comprehensive response to some of your comments when time permits.

“Really you did no such thing—your response was to call me a liar which is just fine, you are certainly welcome to do that.”

Link please.

I do not believe I did any such thing. IIRC, you were confused about what document you were looking at, which was partially computer generated (most likely in the late 1970’s) and you failed to note the hand-typed U of HI graduate degrees recorded in the lower right-hand corner.

You, also have failed to provide evidence of a coherent alternative narrative with alternative parents for Barry that I have seen.

Do you claim that the FOIA INS docs are forged and the U of HI registrar and U of WA current databases are tampered with, all of which have produced numerous FOIA confirmations that Stanley Ann was at both institutions and in each other’s institutions, and tie to the INS docs, IIRC?