Posted on 08/28/2012 8:28:46 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Made it far enough to catch that gem...
“Some mean rich Republican wants to take away all the goodies the gummint done give me.”
I'm so glad this ignoramus is a “retired” educator. She can't poison any more minds.
How dare you call it, ah, a woman! :)
2) You're a hopeless imbecile
3) You're a suicidal Jew black or other self hating minority
4) You're a useless lazy fat ass who lives and wishes to continue to live off of other peoples backs.
5) You're some combination of all the above
“General Motors is Alive “
It’s on life-support.
Evidently ed majors were as stupid back in the day as they are now.
Word. Zero cred based on her title.
Amen FRiend. Since I'm 70, I well recall the despicable Hubert Horatio Humphrey, Jr. He was a big supporter of Franklin Diablo Roosevelt's various "deals" and fully embraced the leftism of upper-Midwest populists. That alone puts HHH in the camp of Marxists. And, just as bad, he was a big defender of union thugs. I have no doubt that Hubie Humphrey and Teddy Kennedy are in close quarters...for all of eternity.
Obama has none of the compassion or values in the HH quote. Everything he does is politically motivated and crafted for one reason only; to get reelected so he can carry on his mission of deconstructing America. He does not care for people - he uses people.
Yup.
Zer0 is for the children? Seems like children for Zer0 are for the purposes of indoctrination to the doctrine of collectivism. Such a doctrine has its roots in Marxism. Do we want that for our children?
"Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms...The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard, against the tyranny which now appears remote in America but which historically has proven to be always possible."
- HUBERT H. HUMPHREY
I’M SURE IF YOU HAD A DOG WITH A BOWEL PROBLEM,YOU WOULD PUT HIS CRATE ON TOP.
I HAD A 3# DOG DEVELOPING A PROBLEM(IN THE CAR)AS I DROVE THROUGH OKLAHOMA AND COULD NOT STOP UNTIL I GOT TO ILLINOIS.
I WOULDN’T WISH THIS PROBLEM ON ANYONE.
I HAVE NEVER SEEN OBAMA IN A CAR WITH HIS DOG.
I HAVE HEARD HE HAS EATEN DOG.
You are astute...the first to mention “that gem”. :-)
Thanks.
Touche’ ;-)
I didn’t want to call her a w@@kie for fear that my comment would be pulled. One can never tell with moderators these days... Besides, that would be an insult to w@@kies.
6. He looks black.
7. He looks black.
8. He looks black.
9. He looks black.
10. He looks black.
Repeat to infinity.
Saundra, if he did not look black would you have voted for him?
I think we know the answer.
2) He's going to redistribute other people's hard-earned money and give it to me.
3) He's going to redistribute other people's hard-earned money and give it to me.
4) He's going to redistribute other people's hard-earned money and give it to me.
5) He's going to redistribute other people's hard-earned money and give it to me.
Let's just try one. "He's (Obama) a Constitutional Scholar who understands the need for limits to our rights."
No, Saundra, there is no information to document any factual reason to believe he is a Constitutional Scholar. As an "educator," where is your source for that? He was employed as a "lecturer" on limited subjects related to the Constitution at the U of C. His time as Editor of the Harvard Law Review produced no writings which would indicate any "scholar" status. By his own statements, he believes ours is a "flawed" Constitution and "a document of negative liberties."
By the same token, renowned jurists from America and across the world have declared it to be, among other glowing descriptions, "the most wonderful document ever produced" by the mind of man.
And, by the way, Saundra, the American Constitution, according to its Framers and those who explained it to the States, is a document which limits the rights "We, the People" grant to our representatives in government. It is not a document by which the government limits our rights.
So much for his understanding of the Constitution--an yours, apparently.
Well. Well, well. I have often said that liberals engage in Orwellian doublethink, and that the cognitive dissonance that has to cause in them is a a source of their, er...mental illness, but...this has to take the cake.
I saw this part: "...The moral test of government is how it treats those who are in the dawn of life..."
Who is more in the "dawn of life" than an unborn child?
And I most DEFINITELY don't need to go into cutting $700 million from Medicare to apply to Obamacare, which is going to deny that money to many people who don't meet the "comparative effectiveness" guidelines.
Unbelievable.
Just...wow.
Shouldn’t this be posted in the Tripe section? As in, who cares?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.