Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dog owners keep most of $620,000 in damages
Frederick News Post ^ | September 19, 2012 | Danielle E. Gaines

Posted on 09/22/2012 1:14:01 PM PDT by Politicalmom

The April verdict by a Frederick County jury that awarded $620,000 to a Taneytown family after their dog was shot by a sheriff's deputy was upheld by a Montgomery County judge.

An attorney for the Frederick County Sheriff's Office argued that the jury's verdict should be set aside because it went against the weight of the evidence presented during the seven-day trial. Michael B. Rynd asked Judge Marielsa Bernard to either set aside the verdict or grant his motion for a new trial.

Bernard heard the case after Frederick County judges recused themselves.

She denied Rynd's motion, saying it would be inappropriate to substitute her judgment for the jury's verdict. She issued her ruling Monday.

Rynd also filed a motion to have the $620,000 judgment lowered.

Bernard agreed with Rynd that Maryland law caps damages for veterinary bills at $7,500 and reduced the original $20,000 for those costs.

The rest of the award, $600,000, was for mental anguish, pain and suffering, according to court records.

Rynd argued that portions of that amount should have been decreased because the jury awarded the exact same amount to each of the two homeowners, Roger and Sandi Jenkins. Sandi Jenkins seemed more upset during testimony at trial, so the damages should be less for her husband, Rynd said.

Bernard denied that part of the motion.

On April 3, a six-person jury found Deputy First Class Timothy Brooks violated the Jenkinses' rights under the Maryland Constitution when he shot their chocolate Labrador retriever, Brandi, on Jan. 9, 2010, while he and Deputy First Class Nathan Rector were at their Bullfrog Road home looking for their son, who was wanted on a civil warrant.

(Excerpt) Read more at fredericknewspost.com ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: dog; doggieping; donutwatch; labradorretriever; lawsuit; maryland; police; shooting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-164 next last
To: Norm Lenhart

Your posts on this thread are outstanding. I feel like I’m back in the dojo watching the master teach a child. My humble thanks for the work you’re doing here. Fortunately, FR is well read so that your wisdom here will spread beyond your normal sphere of influence!


81 posted on 09/22/2012 4:22:14 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: GBA

I am humbled ;)

But I’m not saying anything that anyone with common sense doesn’t already know or can figure out with a little thought,


82 posted on 09/22/2012 4:28:48 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace; lone star annie

I missed the part where it says grown up adults should get $600,000 for phonied up pain and suffering just because their pooch got shot and survived. Get a grip!


83 posted on 09/22/2012 5:30:29 PM PDT by dennisw (Government be yo mamma - Re-elect Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Regardless, that was not your point.


84 posted on 09/22/2012 5:38:07 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: donna

“Read the whole thread so you know what you’re mad about.”

That was a lame response, arrogant, too. I guess we should ask you to actually read the article before shooting your mouth off.


85 posted on 09/22/2012 5:39:38 PM PDT by CodeToad (Be Prepared...They Are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

This isn’t about what a dog is worth. It’s about what a dog owners dignity is worth. If this ***hole shot my dog he’d already be dead.


86 posted on 09/22/2012 5:40:23 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Their dignity isn’t worth $600,000. They are rip off artists who got a dumb jury in ultra liberal Montgomery county Maryland to help them steal from the taxpayers. Hopefully they will end up with something more fair in the $10,000 range to cover vet bills


87 posted on 09/22/2012 6:15:51 PM PDT by dennisw (Government be yo mamma - Re-elect Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother; Titan Magroyne; Badeye; SandRat; arbooz; potlatch; afraidfortherepublic; ...
WOOOF!

Computer Hope

The Doggie Ping list is for FReepers who would like to be notified of threads relating to all things canid. If you would like to join the Doggie Ping Pack (or be unleashed from it), FReemail me.

88 posted on 09/22/2012 6:20:23 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

$600k for a dog?

I love my dog. As much as anyone else. But she ain’t worth $600k.

Does this dog talk or something.


89 posted on 09/22/2012 6:27:47 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am NOT from Vermont. I am from MA. And I don't support Romney. Please read before "assuming.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

$600k for a dog?

I love my dog. As much as anyone else. But she ain’t worth $600k.

Does this dog talk or something.


90 posted on 09/22/2012 6:27:47 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am NOT from Vermont. I am from MA. And I don't support Romney. Please read before "assuming.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

$600k for a dog?

I love my dog. As much as anyone else. But she ain’t worth $600k.

Does this dog talk or something.


91 posted on 09/22/2012 6:27:49 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am NOT from Vermont. I am from MA. And I don't support Romney. Please read before "assuming.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

There is always the fear they would slobber you to death. Certainly a shooting offense.


92 posted on 09/22/2012 6:31:05 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am NOT from Vermont. I am from MA. And I don't support Romney. Please read before "assuming.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

There is always the fear they would slobber you to death. Certainly a shooting offense.


93 posted on 09/22/2012 6:31:07 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am NOT from Vermont. I am from MA. And I don't support Romney. Please read before "assuming.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

A little late to the party, but I agree with you.


94 posted on 09/22/2012 6:42:55 PM PDT by beandog (All Aboard the Choo Choo Train to Crazy Town)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Thank goodness we have the power to sue irresponsible police forces and the elected officials who oversee careless, cya police bosses.

Money talks to cruel and disrespectful meat heads (when common sense, morality and decency don't)...and voters have to pay for their employees’ screw ups.

Reminds the voters they are the police department's employers - not the bully with a badge. Respecting the property, individual rights and lives of others matters, even for cops. Here's one police department that will not be shooting pets as standard operating procedure. Many more to go.

I'm sending this article to our city council and Mayor. Last thing we need is a wild hair meat head screwing up. As far as I know, they are on top of this kind of crap, but you never know what training cops are getting these days from the crotch grabbing perverts at Homeland inSecurity.

95 posted on 09/22/2012 6:50:43 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

You’re doing a little backpedaling now, LOL.


96 posted on 09/22/2012 6:56:01 PM PDT by donna (Chick-news: They report on what they love (Obama and movie stars and themselves).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

And hopefully the cop who did it will catch a bullet.


97 posted on 09/22/2012 7:20:17 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; Tolerance Sucks Rocks

MARYLAND PING


98 posted on 09/22/2012 7:36:12 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; ...

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


99 posted on 09/22/2012 8:36:53 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Hey sweetie! :-)


100 posted on 09/22/2012 8:39:02 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Romney/Ryan 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson