[algore]

So these sandwiches are fishy after all ?

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

IIRC they buy thousands of cases of Starkist Tuna every month.

If they are not using them to make sandwiches, what are they using all the tuna for?

[Michael.SF.]

Seven lawyers for a tuna sandwich case?

OJ did not have that many.

[DugwayDuke]

Reminds me of the suit brought by another women.
The package said ‘ready in 60 seconds” but since that did not include time to remove product from packaging so it was false advertising.

[NWFree]

It’s was a frog that had transitioned to a tuna

[Roadrunner383]

“..the plaintiffs later dialed back their claims, saying in a later filing they simply couldn’t determine whether the tuna in Subway’s salad was ‘100% sustainably caught skipjack and yellowfin tuna,’

Well, where is the case?

If they can’t prove it’s not tuna, what were they going to say once they got before a jury? “We don’t know whether it’s tuna or not, but we want millions of dollars anyway”.

[ronniesgal]

how would she know in the first place?

[Saltmeat]

Well, if she is unable to prove that it isn’t tuna, then can she agree that it is trans-tuna. Yep, whatever it is has identified as tuna. Case closed or she will forever be known as tunaphobia.

[Tijeras_Slim]

It’s scrod that identifies as tuna.

[umbagi]

Grifting through Lawfare, like stupid, should hurt. Lawyers should have been sanctioned back when they “dialed back” their case.

[Songcraft]

Their Unbeef is hard to mistake in those fishy subs...

[Do_Tar]

I quit eating tuna when they took the dolphin out.

[metmom]

Last July, U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco let Amin's case continue but rejected her claim that 'reasonable consumers' would expect only tuna and nothing else, calling it a 'fact of life' that ingredients such as mayonnaise were okay.

He should have dismissed the case altogether. That is stinking ridiculous.