Posted on 06/16/2023 7:26:19 PM PDT by algore
An anti-feminist influencer has sparked outrage online after arguing that divorce should be illegal and women shouldn't have the right to vote.
Hannah Pearl Davis, who is known online as Pearl, has more than 1.52 million subscribers to her controversial YouTube channel, where she touts her conservative and misogynistic viewpoints.
The 26-year-old content creator saw a spike in popularity this year after the arrest of misogynist influencer Andrew Tate, with whom she shares a number of controversial opinions.
Davis defended her beliefs during her recent sit-down interview with Ethan Klein on his H3 Podcast, saying 'we should have policies that push family'
'I think feminism overall was a bad thing. I think women are happier when we have a family and kids over a career in the long run,' she explained.
Davis claimed that children from single-mother households are more likely to drop out of school, go to prison, and have mental health issues.
She argued that in order to keep families together, we have to 'get rid of incentives that incentivize women to leave' their marriages, such as child support and alimony.
'I think we should ban divorce too. Yeah, I think that should be banned,' she said.
Klein tried to get her to acknowledge that it would be 'silly' to make divorce illegal, but she doubled down on her stance.
'I just think that if you want to leave, you just shouldn't get married,' she told the host. 'So, that's just my opinion.'
Davis finally acquiesced that there should be an exception to her divorce ban in the case of domestic violence, but only if the marriages are 'one-sided physically abusive.'
'I just think that the goal should be to keep families together, and the goal should be to work through it,' she said
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
common sense 100 years ago. Now it is nearly illegal to say these things.
I wonder how much damage to society was caused by the birth control pill.
While it might be a bit of a stretch to say that divorce should be illegal, it IS true that no-fault divorce has ruined America.
It allows the woman to cheat and be rewarded with custody, half of everything and a fat child support stipend. It’s insane.
I will never remarry, and when my son comes of age I will advise him not to do the same. It’s just too risky.
“common sense 100 years ago”
Yup ...I like her.
the problem with common sense is... it’s not very common.
Lots to both women and men
I have read lots of papers about how women on the pill prefer a different kind of man when pilled. They go off it get pregnant and hate everything about him
Wow. They are so easy to troll. I guess it’s fair to call her anti-feminist, she hits them pretty hard. She is six feet tall, and plays semi-professional basketball.
Wow. They are so easy to troll. I guess it’s fair to call her anti-feminist, she hits them pretty hard. She is six feet tall, and plays semi-professional basketball.
If you looks st the facts. Andrew Tate is more anti-male than misogynist.
The number of lies an article contains is directly proportional to the number of adjectives.
I’m with Hannah Pearl Davis on this one.
Indeed.
“common sense 100 years ago. Now it is nearly illegal to say these things.”
Yep, even Reagan had to put Sandra D. on the Supreme Court, costing our side NUMEROUS cases...and it was only because he needed the woman’s vote.
An HONEST female conservative would GLADLY give up her vote if it meant that women would no longer be allowed to vote. A female conservative who would not do that, is a person who puts her tribe first, not the country.
pretty close to N.T. Biblical divorce (or ban on divorce for the purposes of marrying someone else).
woman has a good head on her shoulders.
She has the right to choose not to vote for herself. She does not have the right to force that choice on the rest of us. And even in today’s world there’s nothing stopping her from finding a breadwinner husband and becoming a SAHM if that’s what she wants to do. Nothing except feminist disapproval, that is, and real conservatives don’t care what the left thinks of them anymore than they favor using the heavy hand of government to force their life choices on others.
As for divorce I don’t think it’s a good thing but there are cases where it’s justified (abuse, adultery, etc.). A blanket ban is too extreme.
“women shouldn’t have the right to VOTE because they can’t be drafted”
Ridiculous.
Women shouldn’t have the vote because they vote for false promises of safety over liberty, and for free stuff from the daddy state rather than free enterprise.
To be fair, not bad for a girl though. At least she’s right, even if for the wrong reason.
Women have a lot of wonderful qualities, but being good leaders or choosing good leaders is not their forte. They let their emotions make decisions.
The Thatchers and Golda Meir are few and far between.
The 19th amendment wasn’t such a good idea.
Also, property owners, that means people with something to lose, were the only ones who could vote as well.
There was a very good reason behind it. But feelings and what is fair ended that practice.
Members of The Militia could also vote. Don't forget them.
Her not voting doesn’t offset the choices women are making as voters which she disagrees with. You are suggesting women should be voters but not subject to a draft. That’s not equality. She also understands exceptions for divorce but it’s too easy to quit a marriage rather than work on the marriage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.