Posted on 12/19/2002 5:49:58 PM PST by ArcLight
Men's taste in women has changed dramatically over the past half-century, shifting away from girls with curves and big breasts towards the androgynous and the skinny.
The assertion comes from two psychoanalysts who pored over every Playboy from December 1953 and calculated the body mass index of every centrefold. Over 577 issues, the models became taller and their waist increased, while their hips became narrower and their bust became smaller. If Playboy is any guide, the needle on the male sexual compass has switched from Marilyn Monroe to Eva Herzigova, the scientists say.
(Excerpt) Read more at theage.com.au ...
I certainly hope the parts don't fall off the Italian women the way thy do off at least some of the Italian automobiles. Or have you never owned a Fiat 500?<p. -archy-/-
Like Mark Twain said, *All generalities are untrue.*
But some women are just sweets with varying amounts of sugar, and not much more substance than a wand of candyfloss from the county fair.
And some are not.
-archy-/-
Rachel Griffiths. I expect we'll be seeing her in another film or two....
Why do you say that?? ;-)
On Six Feet Under, she looks like a mutt if you ask me.
True, and sad.
My theory of preemptive selection of a slender mate remains a good explanation for the observed selection trend among men and at the very least represents my selection strategy.
I didn't have that option. For me, the curves of the hips are the make-or-break issue for me. I just can't get turned on by skinny, hipless women who look like boys from the back.
I still believe that even an extremely voluptuous woman with right musclo-skeletal structure is more susceptible to becoming fat than a genetically thin woman
Perhaps. But the voluptuous woman has a considerable tolerance for weight gain, before she loses her appeal -- whereas a genetically hipless woman who gains any weight at all, ends up looking like a potbellied man.
If voluptuous woman with nice "breeder hips", does put on a little weight, it mostly goes right TO the hips, enhancing rather than detracting from her luscious "pear" proportions. Whereas I've seen plenty of hipless wonders who quickly lost what little trace of feminine proportions they did have, because they gain weight in the waist ("apples") and end up with a "male" waist-hip ratio.
On Six Feet Under, she looks like a mutt if you ask me.
Well, you gotta admit that a dark comedy set in a funeral home may not be the ideal glamour role.
But Rebecca DeMornay managed to take a role with a character in a far less plesant setting and shine through it, so we'll see what Griffiths manages next try, though I doubt she's up to the standard set by Katherine Hepburn in The African Queen, either.
Well, she's definitely a prize.......but hardly a "trophy". She also happens to be the mother of our seven children (one at a time, the hard way) and we'll have been married 25 years in February. Guess there's a little more goin' on here than the "Trophy Wife Syndrome". :)
I don't think so. I think Playboy still pretty much nails it, and the day people turn to Maxim over Playboy just isn't going to happen. As far as Playboy's sales drop is concerned . . . have you ever heard of a little thing called the Internet? It's all the rage nowadays . . . you can get "porn" on it and everything---for free.An example of one of Playboy's best, Nicole Van Croft:
Does she count? |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.