Skip to comments.
Why we should legalise hard drugs
Observer (UK) ^
| February 23, 2003
| Henry McDonald
Posted on 02/25/2003 7:22:28 AM PST by MrLeRoy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-156 next last
To: robertpaulsen
The motion was defeated by 80 votes to 44."Close. Keep trying.
So the Cambridge Union now defines truth?
21
posted on
02/25/2003 9:25:50 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: apackof2
To the conservative, the only liberty is "a liberty connected with order: that not only exists along with order and virtue, but which cannot exist at all without them."
Can you give us a cite for the quote? Tx.
To: eastsider
I suspect there can be no cites. "Ordered liberty" is a contradiction of terms. Such a thing cannot exist. You have liberty (which can be and usually is chaotic) or you have order. I suspect most of the WODDIES and their sychophants prefer order because they are afraid to be free and to have the ulltimate responsibility for themselves and their own well-being in their own hands. They cannot stomach that sort of responsibility and want someone else (the National Daddy) to give them direction and take the responsibility for them. Ultimately, they will find (either in this life or standing before their Creator) that THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEMSELVES AND THEIR OWN ACTIONS. Abdicating that responsibility does not absolve them. It only makes matters worse for ALL of us.
23
posted on
02/25/2003 11:07:25 AM PST
by
dcwusmc
("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
To: eastsider
"This tension has often been reconciled by what George Washington called "ordered liberty." British statesman Edmund Burke explained it as, "liberty connected with order; [liberty] that not only exists along with order and virtue, but which cannot exist at all without them."
Ordered liberty is not license. It is not, as Judge Learned Hand said, "the ruthless, the unbridled will." Learned Hand warned that, absent order, liberty becomes license, ultimately leading to the denial of liberty. In a world of unbridled license, the strong do what they will and the weak suffer what they must. Freedom to act according to one's will is lost to the infringement, by force if necessary, of the will of another.
Nor is ordered liberty a euphemism for Big Brother. A pervasive order in which security is guaranteed by a massive, invasive police power that prevents crime before it happens by monitoring everything its citizens say, do and think strangles freedom. In such a society, as Orwell observed, liberty dies.
Remarks of Attorney General John Ashcroft
Eighth Circuit Judges Conference
Duluth, Minnesota
August 7, 2002
To: robertpaulsen
Freedom to act according to one's will is lost to the infringement, by force if necessary, of the will of another.
Thank you for the cite to, and quote from, AG Ashcroft's remarks. Ashcroft seems to be saying that freedom is not the right to do what one wills, but rather is the right to do what is right -- which presupposes a certain order. Coupled with Burke's remark, I understand that to mean that a human action is "right" when it is ordered toward virtue.
I concur.
To: eastsider
Ashcroft seems to be saying that freedom is not the right to do what one wills, but rather is the right to do what is right -- which presupposes a certain order. The problem is, who in government defines virtue? Ashcroft? Bill Clinton? Hillary Clinton? Jimmy Carter? For Bill Clinton, it would be virtuous for citizens to give up their guns and let him be president for life.
26
posted on
02/25/2003 2:31:15 PM PST
by
dirtboy
To: dirtboy
I'm unclear what you mean. Let's take the virtue of Justice, for example. Are you asking who defines Justice? Or are you asking who defines whether a particular act is just?
To: eastsider
I'm unclear what you mean. Let's take the virtue of Justice, for example. Are you asking who defines Justice? Or are you asking who defines whether a particular act is just?I think my meaning is quite clear. What is a virtue to us conservatives is often a vice to liberals, and vice versa (pun intended). Therefore, if you wish to have a government driven by virtue, that government is at the whim of the virtues of those in power...
28
posted on
02/25/2003 3:00:39 PM PST
by
dirtboy
To: dirtboy
The judgment whether an act is just or not is an application of the facts to the definition of justice, and freedom would be the right to act justly. In our system, an independent judiciary determines whether one has acted justly or unjustly.
To: dirtboy
Therefore, if you wish to have a government driven by virtue, that government is at the whim of the virtues of those in power...While there are the rare few who truly are driven by virtue (even that is arguable, given that moderation is considered a virtue, and such men are seldom, if ever, moderate), it doesn't seem to compare to the kind of ambition men show in pursuit of vice. While not defending vice, the idea of "driven by virtue" doesn't seem to be conceptually consistent with history and human nature.
30
posted on
02/25/2003 3:14:55 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: eastsider
Can you give us a cite for the quote? Tx.An American patriot
Here's a few more
Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams
"The future and success of America is not in this Constitution, but in the laws of God upon which this Constitution is founded." James Madison
No truth is more evident to any mind than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people." Noah Webster
It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible." George Washington
31
posted on
02/25/2003 3:19:32 PM PST
by
apackof2
(You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you Free.. John 8:32)
To: exnavy; robertpaulsen
thanks on behalf of the author
32
posted on
02/25/2003 3:22:24 PM PST
by
apackof2
(You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you Free.. John 8:32)
To: apackof2
Thanks for the cite and the quotes. At the risk of sounding like I'm from another galaxy, is "An American Patriot" a recent book that contains all the quotes you posted?
To: eastsider
At the risk of sounding like I'm from another galaxy, is "An American Patriot"If you are a libertarian you are from another galaxy.
No "An american patriot" is my description for the author of the article
34
posted on
02/25/2003 3:38:10 PM PST
by
apackof2
(You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you Free.. John 8:32)
To: robertpaulsen; yall; *Wod_list
"Nor is ordered liberty a euphemism for Big Brother. A pervasive order in which security is guaranteed by a massive, invasive police power that prevents crime before it happens by monitoring everything its citizens say, do and think strangles freedom. In such a society, as Orwell observed, liberty dies."
Remarks of Attorney General John Ashcroft
Eighth Circuit Judges Conference
Duluth, Minnesota
August 7, 2002
_________________________________
And as he spoke, last August, planning was going forward on the massive, invasive police power 'bong bust' display of a few days ago.
An invasive power that seeks to prevent crime before it happens by monitoring everything citizens say, do and buy on the internet.
The hypocrisy of this administration has little or no limit.
35
posted on
02/25/2003 3:45:39 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: apackof2; robertpaulsen
I was hoping to read Burke's quote ("liberty connected with order; [liberty] that not only exists along with order and virtue, but which cannot exist at all without them") in context. Can either of you tell me where Burke's quote (or the other quotes in post #31 above) comes from?
To: tpaine
"planning was going forward on the massive, invasive police power 'bong bust'""Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
I hope you see a conflict between these two statements. Therein lies the problem.
Do you think there was any need for a "massive, invasive police power 'bong bust'" in the days of John Adams? Do you think a moral and religious people would be organizing "bong parties"?
You throw away morals, elevate shameful acts, denigrate religion, remove personal resonsibility --- then you look around and cry for your "Constitutional Right" to smoke dope. Sorry, you threw that away, too.
To: exnavy
That is precisely what the merry band of libertarian bashers do here ALL the time. They put up silly pictures of people who are identified as liberatians and do the same thing. I haven't heard you complain about that. Maybe I missed you admonishing them about it. Care to disavow that kind of thing now?
To: robertpaulsen
You throw away morals,I find your political beliefs to be immoral.
elevate shameful acts,
It is shamful to advocate the use of force to further your political goals
denigrate religion,
Which one? I denigrate Islam. And the brand of radical violence mongering in the name of the Almighty advanced by pretend Christians,
remove personal resonsibility ---
libertarians call for personal responsibilty on all issues at all times, unlike Republicans
then you look around and cry for your "Constitutional Right" to smoke dope.
The constitution does not confer rights, some of the people can't get that through their heads, they mistakenly believe that rights are granted by benevolent governments
Sorry, you threw that away, too.
No, you threw out your freedom, and now you are trying to throw out mine.
To: tpaine
Quoting John Ashcroft on liberty is like quoting Hillary Clinton on ethics.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-156 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson