Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Five Failed Predictions of Creationism
Crevo thread: Professor Dumped Over Evolution Beliefs ^ | 24 March 2003 | PatrickHenry

Posted on 04/01/2003 8:12:41 AM PST by PatrickHenry

This vanity thread was inspired by a provocative question that Junior directed to a creationist: "Biblical prophesies notwithstanding, what biological predictions does creationism make?" The creationist didn't respond, but I did, as follows:

I can think of a few creationist predictions. Because -- according to creationism -- all species were specially created at virtually the same time, and did not gradually evolve from earlier forms:

1. There should be no transitional species.
2. There are most certainly no pre-human species.
3. There should be no evidence, whether in fossils or DNA, showing the chronological evolution of life.
4. There must surely be at least one species, and probably several, having no genetic similarities with any other life on earth.
5. The fossil record must show all kinds of species (such as dinosaurs and humans) living together at the same time.
I shall call these The Five Failed Predictions of Creationism.

In fairness to the creationists, although the first three have already been disproved (for example: #1 -- Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ, #2 -- Human Ancestors, more #2 -- Comparison of all skulls, #3 -- Tree of Life Project ), the last two (#4 and #5) can't yet be considered to be totally failed predictions. All we can do is point out that the predicted evidence has not yet been discovered. Given the lack of actual research being conducted by creationists, it is unlikely to be discovered.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: creationism; crevolist; darwin; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 last
To: Blzbba
Welcome to FreeRepublic.
161 posted on 05/13/2003 11:47:58 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Jr.,
Interesting that now alone do you care as to the salvatory requirements. The exclusionary nature of your response speaks for itself. The man above states that all truth will be revealed post humously (who would/could argue that?) Ok, Ok, the inference was that you were hellbound, but was it not John (JC's best friend) who blatanly stated "in the beginning was the word...and the word became flesh and dwelt among us."? So JC's pre-existence should be acknowledged. Um, for clarification purposes, are you saying you are Christian (ie: one who believes in the sacrificial, penal, atonement of Christ on the cross, and his subsequent resurrection?)???(y/n please)
1 more Q.: When God made man, he is said to have created him from mud---When Jesus healed the (one of many) blind man, he spit into dirt (made mud) and spread it on the man's eyes (definitely a "creative" act.) Was this not a statement of his earlier pre-existence?


162 posted on 09/10/2004 12:08:26 AM PDT by ManyWritersOneAuthor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian; PatrickHenry; js1138; BMCDA; metacognative; jennyp; gomaaa; Dimensio; ...
'magine that... Quoted on an April Fool thread. In a round-a-bout way of getting there, by clicking the first link in PH's "THIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON CREATIONISM (Actual debate posts)"

Long about the second page, there's a link to July 2002 issue of Scientific American and their

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?colID=1&articleID=000D4FEC-7D5B-1D07-8E49809EC588EEDF

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

One question that's really troubling me, is: IF there is a common ancestor of modern apes and humans, then WHERE is the fossil record from the common ancestor to the modern ape?

Pardon my HTML. It's been a while...

163 posted on 12/27/2005 2:04:57 PM PST by packrat01 (Politics:Saying "Islam is a religion of peace" while seeking final destruction of Islamist Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I followed your first link, to the FAQ.

Opening page known transitions and 1st page of the Introduction, assumed to be closely related.

"Assumed knowledge" is not "known facts"...

I stopped there. There's no point in following their logic; they're without hope.

164 posted on 12/27/2005 2:18:20 PM PST by packrat01 (Politics:Saying "Islam is a religion of peace" while seeking final destruction of Islamist Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Hell, even the head of my church, the Pope, has accepted the scientific validity of evolution.

The head of your church accepts a lot of stuff that isn't true... things like, he's head of the church.

165 posted on 12/27/2005 3:03:36 PM PST by packrat01 (Politics:Saying "Islam is a religion of peace" while seeking final destruction of Islamist Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: packrat01

Gee, don't let your anti-Catholic bias show, or anything.


166 posted on 12/28/2005 5:20:14 PM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I'm a card-carryin' excatholic. Thank you very much...

Funny, I started reading the Bible and found out all that I was taught by the RCC; wasn't true.

167 posted on 12/28/2005 6:26:32 PM PST by packrat01 (Politics:Saying "Islam is a religion of peace" while seeking final destruction of Islamist Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: packrat01

Funny, I read the Bible from cover to cover twice (and several of the books individually several more times), and I don't find Catholicism to be in contradiction. What you meant was your personal interpretation of Scripture and that of the Church did not mesh.


168 posted on 12/28/2005 7:06:36 PM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Junior
When the church twists things to say what ain't said; yeah, I suppose you could say our interpretations did not mesh.

Matt 23:9 Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven.

and every priest is father so-and-so, and some of them are a real so-and-so.

169 posted on 12/28/2005 8:09:26 PM PST by packrat01 (Politics:Saying "Islam is a religion of peace" while seeking final destruction of Islamist Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: packrat01

So you called your dad by his first name, I take it? Ever thought it was talking about putting other gods before God? No one mistakes a priest for God -- except for the average Protestant trying to score points.


170 posted on 12/28/2005 8:22:58 PM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I called him "dad" or "pa". Priests set themselves up to be "as gods" by forgiving sins?.

I'm an above-average Protestant, as I know of that which I'm protesting.

171 posted on 12/29/2005 10:29:35 PM PST by packrat01 (Politics:Saying "Islam is a religion of peace" while seeking final destruction of Islamist Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: packrat01
You know, I've been a Catholic for 40 years now, and my wife converted in 2002; neither of us has heard a priest say he's forgiven our sins.

If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us [our] sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. [1Jo 1:9]

Confess [your] faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much. [Jam 5:16]

172 posted on 12/30/2005 5:34:07 AM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Why then, the confessional? Why not confess to the one or ones you sinned against? If the sin wasn't of a personal nature, but rather against a Holy and Just God; confess to Him; not a priest.

Forgive was a wrong word, absolution was the word I should have used.

BTW, how many "hail-marys" did your last sin cost ya? how many first Fridays? how many first Saturdays? how many rosaries?

NO, I don't really want to know. Think about it, though.

173 posted on 12/30/2005 9:12:38 PM PST by packrat01 (Politics:Saying "Islam is a religion of peace" while seeking final destruction of Islamist Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: packrat01
BTW, how many "hail-marys" did your last sin cost ya? how many first Fridays? how many first Saturdays? how many rosaries?

None. Father Joe is pretty creative in his penances. I was enjoined to watch how I conducted myself daily.

Man, you must've ceased being a Catholic around grade school. As you get older the penances become more adult-like.

174 posted on 12/30/2005 9:35:09 PM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Junior

maybe fr. joe is a progressive?


175 posted on 12/31/2005 9:28:05 PM PST by packrat01 (Hitchhikers may be escaping inmates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson