Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Catspaw
I am neither advocating killing abortionists nor civil rebellion.

Sure you are.

No, I am not. Logic clearly is not your strong suit. Pointing out that violence WILL happen, that it is axiomatic that the pathological violence of "legal" abortion, is NOT the same as advocating violence. Unless you want to make the specious claim that Mother Teresa was advocating nuclear war when she simply pointed out the axiomatic fact that "The fruit of abortion is nuclear war."

I think you'll have a hard time convicting Mother Teresa of advocating violence. And since I'm simply repeating her warning, you will fail in convicting me of ADVOCATING violence.

Such undelicate language for one so close to God, wouldn't you say?

Righteous Anger does that to a guy.

62 posted on 09/04/2003 9:21:53 AM PDT by Polycarp (PRO-LIFE--without exception, without compromise, without apology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Polycarp
Naw, Polycarp, you just have a foul mouth.
65 posted on 09/04/2003 9:23:35 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
No, I am not. Logic clearly is not your strong suit. Pointing out that violence WILL happen, that it is axiomatic that the pathological violence of "legal" abortion, is NOT the same as advocating violence

Of course you're advocating violence. In fact, you'd probably have that same grin on your face the next time an abortion doc is shot that Hill had, out of joy.

66 posted on 09/04/2003 9:24:57 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson