Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Paranoia at its best - A Look at Media in 2014.
Museum of Media History ^

Posted on 12/06/2004 3:51:50 PM PST by ChewyGasMan

In the year 2014, The New York Times has gone offline. The Fourth Estate's fortunes have waned. What happened to the news? And what is EPIC?

http://www.letitblog.com/epic/


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: a9; amazon; blog; blogger; electronicpaper; friendster; google; media; mediahistory; microsoft; news; newsbot; newyorktimes; sony; tivo
This is great diversion if you have a few minutes to spend studing how the paranoia of some (i.e., liberals) deals with the new strength of bloggers and Internet technology disseminating the news.

I think it shows how much they fear the automation of news and believe it will corrput it, like it's not corrupted already. What would the news be like without a liberal spin?

I welcome this new concept of newsgathering, even though it is fictional. What are your thoughts?

1 posted on 12/06/2004 3:51:52 PM PST by ChewyGasMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChewyGasMan

BTTT


2 posted on 12/06/2004 4:04:38 PM PST by spodefly (I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChewyGasMan

Pretty cool.

If scary.


3 posted on 12/06/2004 4:15:39 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Egon; Eb Wilson; Orgiveme

Bump for later. Interesting presentation style.


4 posted on 12/06/2004 4:19:51 PM PST by RhoTheta (Democrats are the coalition of the coerced and the bribed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChewyGasMan

I got bored at 2007 and bailed out. Took too long to develop. And anyway, he lost me with the Google Grid. It didn't make any sense. It did make me want to check out Tivo, though.


5 posted on 12/06/2004 4:23:17 PM PST by Huck (The day will come when liberals will complain that chess is too violent .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

I've heard it before, back when "zines" were our obsession (pre-Web) -- we were going to make "slick" magazines irrelevant by becoming shallow, narrow, stupid and childish only very popular. For some reason, anything that a lot of people like and control is the end of the world as we know it.

I believe it was Spider Robinson who said "95% of Science Fiction is crap. 95% of EVERYTHING is crap." And I will be willing to bet that no matter what turn the world takes, there will be people left behind who think the new world stinks.

And by the way, the world as I know it has ended about five times since I was old enough to notice. And so what?


6 posted on 12/06/2004 4:28:14 PM PST by KateatRFM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChewyGasMan

So, their main concern is that the NY Times will go belly-up, and with it, all vestiges of "journalistic ethics"?...All I can say is, 2014 can't get here soon enough.


7 posted on 12/06/2004 4:32:51 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChewyGasMan
I had a weird reaction to the presentation. But I don't think it was the one that the presentation was intending it to be. Instead of scaring me, I was excited about the progress of information technology and the extincts of NYT.
8 posted on 12/06/2004 4:41:33 PM PST by bewitched
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KateatRFM
I believe it was Spider Robinson who said "95% of Science Fiction is crap. 95% of EVERYTHING is crap."

Ted Sturgeon. And his number was 90%.

9 posted on 12/06/2004 4:42:22 PM PST by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thulldud

Wild. "EPIC" provides everything from FR to DU!


10 posted on 12/06/2004 4:52:01 PM PST by Woodworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bewitched
Exactly. They're worried that the internet will wipe out the "balanced", "nuanced" coverage of the SMSM.

They shouldn't. Even in the EPIC-dominated hell they see in the future, they can still get their NYT fix if they're willing to sacrifice a few trees! Oh, the humanity!

11 posted on 12/06/2004 4:56:36 PM PST by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson