Big cooperation between Peugeot, Citroen, and Ford in the conception of engines.

PSA Peugeot Citroen compagny. ^ | 12/16/2004 | PSA/ford group press release.

[Champs elysees]

Ford and PSA Peugeot Citroën Announce Plans for Expansion of Diesel Engine Production

Ford Motor Company and PSA Peugeot Citroën are planning to expand production capacity for the 1.4, 1.6 and 2.0 litre high technology diesel engines from the ongoing cooperative agreement between the two companies.

This cooperative agreement is enabling both companies to be world leaders in diesel engineering and manufacture and to achieve industry-leading economies of scale. At the same time the cooperation provides both partners with a wide breadth of state-of-the art common-rail diesel engines. Between 2002 and 2004, more than four million high technology common rail engines have been produced within the framework of this successful cooperation.

Increasing engine demand This success has led to a high demand for the latest technology diesel engines resulting from the agreement with the result that this demand will soon outstrip the existing supply base. As a result it is proposed to optimise supply by adding production capacity for the 1.4 and 1.6 litre diesel engines at Ford's purpose-built Dagenham Diesel Centre, in the UK from 2007, and for the 2.0 litre engine at Volvo's Skövde engine plant in Sweden from 2006.

These installations of additional diesel engine production capacity will create employment opportunities in Ford Motor Company, while maintaining the corresponding high level of employment in the mechanical plants of PSA Peugeot Citroën. This is a clear indicator of the strength of the cooperation between Ford Motor Company and PSA Peugeot Citroën and the fact that it is providing increasing benefits for both sides as it continues to develop.

The agreements signed by PSA Peugeot Citroën and Ford Motor Company in September 1998 involve a large-scale cooperative programme covering the joint design and production of four families of common-rail, direct injection diesel engines. Specifically these are: 1.4 and 1.6 litre engines; 2.0 litre engines; a 2.7 litre V6 engine; and a new family of engines for light commercial vehicle applications. The details for this fourth phase of the cooperative programme are still to be announced.

Accommodating success Engine programmes resulting from this agreement are led by one or other of the partners. PSA Peugeot Citroën have taken the lead in the engineering and production for the first two phases of engine families while Ford has the lead engineering and production responsibility for the V6 premium diesel engine and for the family of engines for light commercial vehicles – the details for which are still to be released.

This latest announcement involving the expansion of production capacity for engines resulting from the first two phases of the agreement is the first time that the manufacturing responsibility has been spread to both partners to accommodate the demand in sales for models using these engines. The continued success of this cooperation will be further demonstrated by the announcement of additional new engine derivatives and families during 2005.

[RayChuang88]

A twist here perhaps ... it is not clear if states such as California (where the majority of Mercedes-Benz sales occur), or Massachusetts, or ..., etc., will allow the sale or even the registration of these new diesel-powered automobiles.

The biggest reason why CARB won't certify diesel engines for automobiles is the fact that US produced diesel fuels have high levels of sulfur compounds, which can cause serious corrosion of engine parts (as BMW found out much to its horror with the 4.0-liter V-8 engine when it was first sold in the USA in the middle 1990's; BMW had to redesign the engine with iron-alloy piston liners to correct the problem). This corrosion will quickly damage the common-rail pressurized direct fuel injection system and combination catalytic converter/diesel particulate trap found on European-market diesel engines.

However, with the EPA mandate of no more than 15 parts per million of sulfur compounds in motor fuels starting September 2006, this will allow CARB to finally certify diesel engines for automobiles, since there will be no more worries about the fuel damaging the fuel-delivery and emission control systems. This will make it possible for Mercedes-Benz to certify 50-state legal turbodiesel engines, and that could mean we may see turbodiesel engines on the next-generation S-Class due in about 18 months for the US market.

By the way, you might see more French-designed cars back in the US market, thanks to Renault being the majority owner of Nissan. Already, the next-generation Nissan Sentra due Fall 2005 will use a lot of components from the Renault Megané sold in Europe; and we may just see these cars in the US market badged as Nissans and using Nissan-designed engines:

Renault Modus:

Renault Scenic:

The Modus and Scenic should easily pass NHTSA safety tests, since both vehicles were designed to get very high ratings on the very stringent European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) safety tests, tests which as just as tough as the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) tests done here in the USA.

[Choose Ye This Day]

This is what I think about when I hear a piece-of-junk Citroen:

Now, I used to drive a Peugot pickup truck (Peugot 504?) in Argentina that was a 5-speed with on-th-column (in the tree) gear shifting. That was a blast to drive.

[PAR35]

'Buy a French car, be a laughingstock' is the reality of it.

There are a lot of Nissans around here.

[glockmeister40]

Here's a little private mail out friend champs elysees (free republic member since three days ago) sent to me a few minutes ago. I guess he didn't want the rest of you Americans to see how he really feels about us:

cheese-eating surrender monkeys ? and Napoleon, Lafayette, Louis 14,The millions of deaths in trenches during WV1... You are a stupid person and Your remark is also stupid as that : Burger-eating Aggressive monkeys.. You are just a little xenophobe.

We are burger-eating aggressive monkeys!!!

Yes, the french are cheese-eating surrender monkeys. I'll give a brief recap of their adventures in the 20th century:

From just before world war one: "Le kepi, c'est la france." The french knew they were going to be in a war with the germans, but their egos wouldn't let them manufacture and wear dark or camoflage uniforms. They went up in front of german machine guns wearing bright red cloth hats. Germans, Americans and British refresh the gene pool in france, 1914-1918.

1940 - germans back again, french surrender in under two weeks. Hitler strollin' through paris. Germans, Americans and British refresh the gene pool in france, 1940-1945

1954 - french got sick in southeast asia - they had to leave - they caught the dien bien flu.

2004 to current - french getting their asses kicked by a bunch of natives in the Ivory Coast.

Who knows what will be in store for france in 2005? Could be anything, but we know it will end in a french surrender.

The french have a choice for a new national language - english or arabic.

[SolutionsOnly]

***"There are a lot of Nissans around here"***

That's like saying a Volvo is a Ford and a Jeep is a Mercedes.

[PAR35]

That's like saying a Volvo is a Ford and a Jeep is a Mercedes.

I wouldn't disagree with that statement.

What nationality would you assign to respectively a Nissan, Mercedes, BMW, Ford, Toyota, and Honda?

Additional relevant info: Nissan Titan, Mercedes M class, BMW made in South Carolina, Ford made in Ontario, Toyota Camry made in Kentucky and Honda Accord made in Ohio.

[SolutionsOnly]

What nationality would you assign to respectively a Nissan, Mercedes, BMW, Ford, Toyota, and Honda?

That's a no-brainer. Japan, Germany, Germany, USA, Japan, and Japan respectively. It's where they are designed and engineered that makes a difference - the cultural influences that subtly affect the process. Where a car is bolted together makes little difference. Whether to attach a part with four bolts or five does. It's not like cars are hand-crafted anymore - it's largely automated whichever country of assembly you're talking about

[RJL]

Champs elysees, Are you part of the French government PR campaign?

This is the second French press release you posted as news today.

[null and void]

Peugeot should return to the United States?

Ummmm. No! (former Peugeot 404 owner)

[null and void]

Airbus. Doesn't the tail fall off if the pilot uses it?

[null and void]

Hey now! Mine had an automatique transmission type ZF. When it died they had to send it to europe for repairs, as there was no-one in North America who would touch it. (Not even the silly french speaking Quebecois)...

[SolutionsOnly]

I thought the exactly the same thing.

Funny thing about the French, they only see things one way. The truth is that we probably despise them more even they hate us. Getting us to 'Buy French' will be a very long and steep road for them. The news that Ford has a partnership with Peugeot damages my opinion of Ford much more than raises my opinion of Peugeot. The same with GE.
And BF Goodrich, and Motel 6....

[null and void]

You are a liar, or not enough informed.

More likely he's had the "pleasure" of owning a french car, and the ability to compare it to a real car. Like maybe a Yugo or Trabbie?

Me? I've owned a Peugeot 404, and a Renault R-12 wagon. No-one was ever able to get the R-12 to decide which of the two idle speeds to settle on.

[RJL]

The news that Ford has a partnership with Peugeot damages my opinion of Ford much more than raises my opinion of Peugeot.

We do think alike. My first thought was maybe it's a good time to short Ford's stock if they're partnering with the French.

[null and void]

My very first thought, too.