Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/21/2004 9:55:46 AM PST by FreeMarket1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FreeMarket1
"...arguing that individual consumers should have the right to choose among nutritional products – and to determine what they should and should not ingest."

Should have the right???

We already have the right.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, SHALL NOT be construed to DENY OR DISPARAGE others retained by the people.

The "people" have the "retained" right to ingest the chemicals of their choice in the quantities of their choice, for the reasons of their choice.

2 posted on 12/21/2004 10:04:15 AM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeMarket1; neverdem
• Would place all products associated with or marketed for “muscle growth” under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

Very worrisome, vague wording. There goes protein powder out the window. And all protein, for that matter. Will they outlaw chicken beef and turkey too?

According to the specific wording of HR.3377, a “supplement” under the DSHEA would be amended to say any product that “does not bear or contain an herb or other botanical, an amino acid or a dietary substance used by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake”.

this wording is unclear to me. Does this mean that amino acids are OK or not? Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA?)

As far as I'm concerned the DEA can stick to monitoring supplement manufacturing facilities for cleanliness. They don't even do that very well.

5 posted on 12/21/2004 10:11:39 AM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeMarket1

A key thrust of this legislation is to assist pharmaceutical companies in ridding themselves of competition...competition in the form of comparatively inexpensive nutritional supplements that are increasingly demonstrating effectiveness in helping to maintain health and prevent/treat various disease conditions...when taken in appropriate concentrations.

Some of these bills (similar to those being adopted by the EU) would allow some (but not all) subtances to continue to be sold, but only in concentrations that would force one to buy/consume perhaps hundreds of capsules to get the equivalent dosage that can currently be obtained in 2-3 capsules.

Follow the money...


6 posted on 12/21/2004 10:12:14 AM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeMarket1

I do think some regulation is in order - like when you overdose on those penis enlargement pills...


7 posted on 12/21/2004 10:19:20 AM PST by talleyman (Merry Christmas! ("And God bless us every one!"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arizona Carolyn

Might be of interest to you...


11 posted on 12/21/2004 10:32:56 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeMarket1
"• Could allow a product to be banned following the submission of just a single isolated “adverse event”. "

Imagine what would happen if we could do the same to the drug industry? Aspirins give me headaches, should that mean it's banned for people who don't get headaches from it? This is absurd, and dangerous. How can we stop this thing?

13 posted on 12/21/2004 10:35:36 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeMarket1

Any time you see Tom Harkin or Dick Durbin's name attached to ANY legislation, you KNOW it's to further the socialist agenda.


20 posted on 12/21/2004 9:30:47 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeMarket1
Could allow a product to be banned following the submission of just a single isolated “adverse event”.

Let's ban Prozac, too. There have been many adverse events. Ohh, I forgot, Prozac benefits politically connected drug companies, while unregulated supplements are a threat to them.

While we're at it, we'd better add water to the list, too. Water poisoning sometimes afflicts overzealous exercisers who drink too much of the suspicious stuff.

25 posted on 12/22/2004 8:47:09 AM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeMarket1; hobbes1

Dang. And I thought the opprossevive nanny state thing was atleast domestically inspired.


29 posted on 12/22/2004 12:58:27 PM PST by NeoCaveman (If you can't be a good example, atleast be a billboard of what not to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson