Posted on 12/22/2004 7:08:44 PM PST by Kitten Festival
City councilman Carlos Herrera in todays El Nacional accuses lawyer Socrates Tinaco of stealing a billion bolivars from Danilo Anderson apartment. Herrera says Socrates distributed this cash among some workers of the Attorney Generals office. He also says they took other property from Andersons home.
Now, what I would like to understand is how Herrera finds it perfectly natural that Prosecutor Anderson had some US$ 520,000 at home. How can he even say that those that took the money should be charged for theft? How can he even suggest that Andersons house was dry of money after four days? Can he explain why there was so much cash at Andersons home? Can he explain where he got it from? Are these numbers just the usual in the robolucion? Were Bermudez $37,000 just small change?
Herrera once again blames bankers for Andersons death, makes the Vice-President responsible for his safety and says that on Monday he was going to be taken away by the investigative police and a grenade was going to be planted on him, but his call to Globovision stopped the plan.
Understand, this guy is pro-Government, not opposition. Try figuring that one out!
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.salon.com ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.