Posted on 02/22/2005 7:05:40 AM PST by Kitten Festival
There's been a lot of spilled ink and wasted pixels on the complicated effort to eulogize the suicide of "new journalism" writer Hunter S. Thompson, with most of it coming out insincere, overwrought, or just not quite getting it. Steve H., the immensely talented blogger at Hog on Ice, is another matter altogether. Writing as someone who was influenced by Thompson, he takes a rueful, almost bitter, but straight look at Thompson and hits the target. He writes the first realistic assessment of what the man amounted to before he met his end. It's a cold hard look at Thompson and why he's found wanting.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
"He was brilliant, so he had to be aware that he had sold himself cheap. ...... I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Thompson killed himself out of sheer disgust. Maybe by creating and living a ridiculous persona, he painted himself into a corner and kept painting and painting until there was no corner left; only paint."
Sums him up perfectly.
Congressman Billybob
Glad I checked it out.
Ditto! ;^)
One of the great triumphs of evil in our age has been our acceptance of the belief that there is no black nor white ... only shades of gray. One must be a sold wholesale to this intellectual parlour trick not to see Hunter Thompson for the disgusting fraud he was.
A man who leads others to distruction must be seen for what he is. Satan's tool.
I think this view is exactly right. Thompson was so afraid of his talent that he spent his life destroying himself rather than develop it.
If you read Tom Wolf's paen to Thompson - it reads like he himself is trying to build up credits so some one will write nice things about him when he dies. Wolf doesn't need to demean himself and his talent like that. Thompson's self-destruction took too long and took too many down with him. The lucky ones realize his destructive and juvenile seduction and grew up; the rest still haven't seen through his shtick.
I am not surprised Boston's Howie Carr holds Thompson as a hero. Carr can be very, very good but all too often he panders to the lowest common denominator and is just a watered down Stern imitation, which is hard enough to take in the 'original'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.