Posted on 03/07/2005 7:23:08 AM PST by traderrob6
After scrutinizing the dozens of print articles concerning the release of this "journalist", a clearer picture of what likely happened is beginning to emerge.
First, the Italian government bears significant reponsiblity because of their failure to inform the US diplomatic officials or military of the negotiated release. Had our people been apprized, precautions to avoid this very thing could have been initiated.
Second, Sgrena said that they were not travelling at a high rate of speed, however, other comments she made betray "her truth": The car kept on the road, going under an underpass full of puddles and almost losing control to avoid them.
Third, Her stories have been somewhat less than consistent. First they went through no checkpoints, then through several checkpoints and then all checkpoints. Initially she said they had been hit by 300-400 rounds from an armored vehicle later dropping the "rounds estimate" and stating they were attacked by tanks. She at first said the attack was deliberate, but has since said "she doesn't know".
Her sequence of events just don't pass the smell test. She asking us to believe that US forces just opened fire on an unidentified vehicle travelling at a slow speed "for no apparent reason". This is completely contrary military SOP.
U.S. troops "attempted to warn the driver to stop by hand and arm signals, flashing white lights, and firing warning shots in front of the car," the statement said. "When the driver didn't stop, the soldiers shot into the engine block, which stopped the vehicle." This is the militaries official description of events and would be totally consistent with standard proceedures.
Considering all we know about Sgrena Guiliana, her newspaper and the blatantly radical agendas of both one must question their credibility. Her description of events contrasted with the facts as we know them just does not add up. One could easily conclude from what we know that the Italy's far left is utilizing rank political exploitation of this event to weaken Bulasconi, soften support for Italian participation in Iraq, and propandize their fanatical pascifist agenda. To say that this "journalist" and the people she is associated with have "a dog in the race" is a gargantuan understatement
This whole thing is going to blow up in Italy's face, hopefully not literally. They should NEVER have paid a ransom demand from a terrorist...by doing so, they basically placed targets on the backs of their own people in Iraq. IMHO, considering the circumstances, they should have asked for a military escort.
One less commie. Hurray!
She's a communist!! What do you expect!!
She was not hit by friendly fire.
She's a communist!
Those commies love the Baathists.
She probably wasn't even kidnapped.
She went to Iraq to help raise money for the Baathist holdovers who provide arms to the insurgency of radical islamist sheeple.
Hopefully, we won't miss her next time.
If our troops' firing on her vehicle was a deliberate attack, she would not have lived to report about it.
Think about that.
There would be no story here if what she's saying were true.
She would be dead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.