Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUer: Why SHOULDN'T siblings be allowed to "marry" or enter civil unions?
The DUmp | 3/17/05

Posted on 03/17/2005 1:55:21 PM PST by lowbridge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Clint N. Suhks

It's not a slope, it's a screaming nose dive.


41 posted on 03/17/2005 2:29:28 PM PST by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
"Git off me, Pa. Yer crushin' my smokes!"

Yep, I've heard that one, too.

42 posted on 03/17/2005 2:29:36 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

I don't think that you can marry your first cousin in N.Y.;where did you get that from?


43 posted on 03/17/2005 2:30:19 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Civil Unions or so-called "gay marriage" are pitiful substitutes for some very real structures humanity has developed in the past.

For example, there's the "family", the "extended family", the "clan", and the "tribe".

We might be well-served if we strengthened the extended family and the clan, to say nothing of "tribe".

Note that the US Constitution does recognize "tribe" as a quite legitimate human gathering, although for bizarre reasons, US law does not!

44 posted on 03/17/2005 2:31:10 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Well I could ask "Who wants to go for a ride?"


45 posted on 03/17/2005 2:32:20 PM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

"Roll over" would have been just as bad, I suspect.


46 posted on 03/17/2005 2:34:08 PM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
YAH!!!..er..interesting...very very interesting.

And thanks for the formula. I never could figure out the "n cousin x removed" stuff, then again I never looked.
47 posted on 03/17/2005 2:34:17 PM PST by tfecw (Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
If I ask my dogs "Who wants to go to town?" their answer is quite clear.

LOL...mine too, that is one of the reasons why I called that guy an idiot.

48 posted on 03/17/2005 2:34:55 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Otherwise, this guy is dumb, even for a DUmmie, for stating this where it can be seen in public.

While its possible, its really not an unheard arguement.

Check out Peter Singer, the ethicist at Princeton, he's given lectures and written articles, that actually follow through on the logic and reasoning of some of these court cases, and these questions.

If one walks through the halls of acadamia, and brings this question up, the variety of answers, in various ways, and the debate they engage in, will either frighten you, disturb you, or you'll be one of those guys who starting looking at the family weird.

For the record, one of my former college profs saw nothing wrong with marriage of any kind as long they were both legal adults (I'm gonna skip how she wanted to even determine what at adult is) regardless of relationship, and she used abortion, and various kinds of biosurgery, etc to back herself up.

I puked after that class.

49 posted on 03/17/2005 2:35:29 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

"Find the ball"


50 posted on 03/17/2005 2:35:49 PM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Our grandfather was a lawyer in Arizona, and he looked it up as we were trying to decide on where to get married. Our family is from NY (Auburn), and that was one of the states we considered. She had friends in NM, and we have an aunt in CA. We eventually decides on CA. It is in the above cases a greater than or equal too thing. CA states that relationship can be no closer than 1st cousin, meaning that as close as 1st cousin is permitted.

In ireland uncle niece marriages are permitted, but Aunt-Nephew is not! go figure.


51 posted on 03/17/2005 2:36:13 PM PST by donmeaker (Burn the UN flag publicly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I don't think that you can marry your first cousin in N.Y.;where did you get that from?

Sadly, you can or at least used to be able to.

I think FDR's marriage to his wife was either 1st cousin or somehow blood close.

Either way, at the time, it would have been illegal in other states.

52 posted on 03/17/2005 2:38:03 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I was curious myself and looked it up. Here is what I found.

Q. Can two first cousins marry?
A. A marriage may not take place in New York State between an ancestor and descendant (that is, a parent, grandparent, etc. and an offspring (child)), a brother and sister (full or half blood), an uncle and niece or an aunt and nephew, regardless of whether or not these persons are legitimate or illegitimate offspring. There is no legal bar against marriage between cousins.

Source

53 posted on 03/17/2005 2:39:33 PM PST by retrokitten (I heart Tony Snow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Ewwwww.

Can I marry my cat?


54 posted on 03/17/2005 2:40:27 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loboinok

I hear ya.


55 posted on 03/17/2005 2:49:24 PM PST by sydneycarton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tfecw
I've always gotten mixed up with the "removes",but there is a site in line,that explains it all.

The 1/2 brother bit threw me some,though.:-(

But here's the easy way.....

Your mother or father has a sibling who has a child. You and that child are FIRST cousins. Each of your marry other people and have a child.Your child and your cousin's child are second cousins.WHY? Because their shared ancestors a 2 generations removed....grand parents.

Where it gets tricky,is when there are 1/2 siblings and/or when a large family has cousins who come from intergenerational age differential,as I have. My great grandmother was the eldest child of none surviving siblings. Her oldest brother's daughter had three sons who I grew up with.I went to my Junior Prom with the middle brother.But before I did,I asked my grandmother IF he was a distant enough cousin,for me to date. She figured it out and okayed it.His great grandparents were my great,great grandparents. :-)

56 posted on 03/17/2005 2:49:52 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Come to think of it, why can't ANYTHING be legal and allowable? After all, somewhere in the world is someone who wants to do something - let it ALL be legal. No rules at all, ever - isn't that what every 12 year old would like?

That depends... It could be the perfect libertarian state or total anarchy.
The problems arise when your rights impede on my rights.
How do we decide those issues?

57 posted on 03/17/2005 2:51:39 PM PST by Dashing Dasher (Your charms have not gone unnoticed by all the angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
YIKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for the info.

58 posted on 03/17/2005 2:51:52 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M

Nooooooooo...FDR and ERR were NOT first cousin at all. They were rather distant (fouth or fifth,I think) cousins.


59 posted on 03/17/2005 2:54:10 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

"Find the ball"

Oy Vey!


60 posted on 03/17/2005 2:54:34 PM PST by Dashing Dasher (Your charms have not gone unnoticed by all the angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson