That is unworthy.We should continually point out the reasons that it would be immoral and unethical to nominate Hillary Clinton. We should constantly draw analogies between the renomination of Robert Torricelli for Senator from New Jersey and any nomination (Heaven fore fend) of Hillary for president.
And we should condemn in no uncertain terms any Democrat who does not oppose her candidacy on moral grounds.
FBI Filegate is exactly like the Saddam WMD issue: in both cases the burden of proof is what is crucial. The burden of proof that the data was used malignantly does not belong on the Republicans whose FBI files were invaded by Craig Livingstone; the burden of proof belongs on the whole Clinton White House, from the Clintons (both of them) down to the janitor. Any one of them could have abused that data; for staying in the Clinton White House after that affair was revealed and never resolved by prosecutions of known felonies everyone in the Clinton WH is tainted by Filegate.
In suing for relief from the ongoing destruction of his military, Saddam agreed to verifiably, and under supervision dismantle his WMD program. The US has not found nearly as much WMD as was expected, but that is not our responsibility; Saddam accepted that responsibility before the cease-fire ending the first Gulf War. By throwing out the weapons inspectors Saddam caused the uncertainty which precipitated Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Nobody who was in Saddam's inner circle should be acccepted into a free Iraqi government - and no one in the Clinton WH should be nominated for President of the United States. If Hillary wanted to be a viable candidate for national office, she should have left the Clinton White House when Filegate came down, and no prosecutions resulted.
.
HILLARY's own personal bully Private Investigator ANTHONY PELLICANO is still sitting in a California Jail for his being found by the FBI possessing illegal C-4 Explosives and hand grenades. Found also in his office were 20 $10,000 bundles of cash for those he would have use these weapons against his clients' enemies. Looks like HILLARY's own is now going to be tried for conspiracy.
Sorta makes you wonder just what other conspiracies were up ANTHONY PELLICANO's sleeve while he and JFK jr were out there amongst us, don't it..?
.
Leaving the clinton White House would have done nothing to cleanse missus clinton. She is mired in the muck of Filegate.(Nothing can render this... woman a viable candidate, in any case. Her 30-year career abusing women is an absolute disqualifier.) Does any sentient being really believe that it wasn't hillary clinton--(hillary just happened to be an acquaintance of bouncer Craig Livingstone's mother)--who hired Craig Livingstone in the first place? (We know hillary clinton hired Jamie Gorelick, the lynchpin in the filegate-clinton putsch- Gorelick Wall triple play, a scheme (see below) that would enable the clintons to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder. ) Missus clinton, with her fascistic mindset and methods, likely engineered the whole deal. Digging up dirt on her perceived enemies is standard operating procedure for the very paranoid missus clinton. |
e would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset. Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall. Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism. While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding). The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style. Further confirmation of the Wall-as-cover-for-clinton-corruption thesis:
Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect. The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.
Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support The-Wall-as-cover-for-international-clinton-crimes thesis. Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 |