Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
Frankly, we should let them nominate her. Just as with Dean, she is incapable of completing a campaign without a meltdown. We blew it with Dean, and we need to learn the lesson.

Damned If I Know

2 posted on 07/03/2005 10:55:34 AM PDT by sharktrager (My life is like a box of chocolates, but someone took all the good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sharktrager
She's her own worst enemy... but she'll have her rapist partner 'correcting' her gaffes on the news every night.

The best way to beat a Clinton... is to have an good, solid agenda. She's forced to carry the baggage of the DNC... and that means gay-marriage, abortion and a Godless-America.

Let the pro's in the right-wing 527's deal with her 'sexuality', the 'missing' FBI files and her back-door attempt at socialized medicine.

8 posted on 07/03/2005 1:08:12 PM PDT by johnny7 (How often does a '47 Rodham require servicing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sharktrager
we should let them nominate her.
That is unworthy.

We should continually point out the reasons that it would be immoral and unethical to nominate Hillary Clinton. We should constantly draw analogies between the renomination of Robert Torricelli for Senator from New Jersey and any nomination (Heaven fore fend) of Hillary for president.

And we should condemn in no uncertain terms any Democrat who does not oppose her candidacy on moral grounds.

FBI Filegate is exactly like the Saddam WMD issue: in both cases the burden of proof is what is crucial. The burden of proof that the data was used malignantly does not belong on the Republicans whose FBI files were invaded by Craig Livingstone; the burden of proof belongs on the whole Clinton White House, from the Clintons (both of them) down to the janitor. Any one of them could have abused that data; for staying in the Clinton White House after that affair was revealed and never resolved by prosecutions of known felonies everyone in the Clinton WH is tainted by Filegate.

In suing for relief from the ongoing destruction of his military, Saddam agreed to verifiably, and under supervision dismantle his WMD program. The US has not found nearly as much WMD as was expected, but that is not our responsibility; Saddam accepted that responsibility before the cease-fire ending the first Gulf War. By throwing out the weapons inspectors Saddam caused the uncertainty which precipitated Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Nobody who was in Saddam's inner circle should be acccepted into a free Iraqi government - and no one in the Clinton WH should be nominated for President of the United States. If Hillary wanted to be a viable candidate for national office, she should have left the Clinton White House when Filegate came down, and no prosecutions resulted.


10 posted on 07/03/2005 1:27:24 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sharktrager
"Frankly, we should let them nominate her. Just as with Dean, she is incapable of completing a campaign without a meltdown. "


NEVER ! That's what people said about the 2nd Clinton run, and her Senate run and we all know how those worked out -

Beat her down at EVERY opportunity - The stake must be pounded in hard and deep.. They will not stay down unless the Democrats themselves are the ones to give the final blow
31 posted on 07/03/2005 6:30:21 PM PDT by RS (Just because they are out to get him, it doesn't mean he's not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson