Skip to comments.
Tom, The Dancing Bug
MSNBC ^
| 2 July 2005
| Ruben Bolling
Posted on 07/05/2005 7:07:57 PM PDT by balrog666
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281 next last
To: balrog666
21
posted on
07/05/2005 7:33:52 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: balrog666
Not really, as history supports much of the bible. Your username is even childishly provocative.
22
posted on
07/05/2005 7:34:34 PM PDT
by
RightthinkinAmerican
(Is the Republican attack machine an assault weapon?)
To: RichInOC
If evolution is a settled scientific fact, then how does one explain the ever-increasing number of untalented, unfunny leftist cartoonists? You'd think those nerds would all die out without leaving progeny. That's a question better left to the women ...
Don't we know they control the ultimate evolution of the human race?
23
posted on
07/05/2005 7:36:05 PM PDT
by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: RightthinkinAmerican
Oh, and there's the little "missing link" problem for you to explain.
24
posted on
07/05/2005 7:37:12 PM PDT
by
RightthinkinAmerican
(Is the Republican attack machine an assault weapon?)
To: RightthinkinAmerican
Not really, as history supports much of the bible. Your username is even childishly provocative. History supports much of most novels, so what?
And your user name isn't? Get a life.
25
posted on
07/05/2005 7:37:49 PM PDT
by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: RightthinkinAmerican
Oh, and there's the little "missing link" problem for you to explain. Look in a mirror.
26
posted on
07/05/2005 7:38:31 PM PDT
by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: balrog666
"And your user name isn't?"
The evolutionary equivalent of "neener neener neener," no doubt. Your sub-genus is showing.
To: balrog666
So sad, little childish creep.
28
posted on
07/05/2005 7:41:02 PM PDT
by
RightthinkinAmerican
(Is the Republican attack machine an assault weapon?)
To: RegulatorCountry
The mirror he''s looking for is his own.
29
posted on
07/05/2005 7:41:44 PM PDT
by
RightthinkinAmerican
(Is the Republican attack machine an assault weapon?)
To: RegulatorCountry
The evolutionary equivalent of "neener neener neener," no doubt. Your sub-genus [sic] is showing. Oooh, such intellectual discourse from a recognized genius!
I may swoon!
30
posted on
07/05/2005 7:47:23 PM PDT
by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: balrog666
"I may swoon!"
Bless her little heart.
To: RightthinkinAmerican
Well this thread devolved into childish name-calling faster than I expected.
32
posted on
07/05/2005 7:48:36 PM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: Kirkwood
"Well this thread devolved into childish name-calling faster than I expected."
Might it have something to do with a tone that can only be described as bigoted, coming from a poster with "666" in her screen name? Ya think?
To: balrog666
Since I discovered that the evolutionists have been lying to me in biology textbooks since I was 10 years old, and fossil records have failed to prove species change, their credibility is virtually zero. Your choice of a ham-fisted cartoon to insult the intellect of those of us who do not swallow this unsubstantiated theory does little to change my mind.
34
posted on
07/05/2005 8:05:22 PM PDT
by
GenXFreedomFighter
(We smirked our way back for a second term!)
To: RegulatorCountry
Actually, I was thinking of the creationist side. There is no reason to be childish just because you can't make your case with facts.
35
posted on
07/05/2005 8:05:27 PM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: GenXFreedomFighter
Since I discovered that the evolutionists have been lying to me in biology textbooks since I was 10 years old, and fossil records have failed to prove species change, their credibility is virtually zero. BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
And this statement tells us what about whom?
36
posted on
07/05/2005 8:12:15 PM PDT
by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: balrog666
All right, you want an example? How about this?
I remember this drawing, or one similar to it, which was supposed to convince my young skull full of mush that since embryos of humans, amphibians, dogs, birds, and reptiles kinda sorta looked alike, then they must all be related. This was published in textbooks long after it was proven to be a fake. If it's such ironclad, settled science, then why all the fakery?
That cartoon also tells me a lot about people who want me to believe in evolution based on the evidence to date.
37
posted on
07/05/2005 8:26:50 PM PDT
by
GenXFreedomFighter
(We smirked our way back for a second term!)
To: woofie
Looks like you like to fight The creationsists started it.
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: balrog666
40
posted on
07/05/2005 9:02:50 PM PDT
by
Clemenza
(Where is the Genius of Love?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
