Posted on 01/06/2006 3:37:19 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Meet Edward G. Rendell, former Democratic National Committee chairman and a tax-and-spend liberal clone of Hillary Clinton.
Is the governor of Pennsylvania subject to random drug testing? I'm beginning to worry about Ed Rendell. I think he's on something. How else do you explain his recent end-of-the-year news conference where he proclaimed a successful 2005 for his administration?
I'm not sure Rendell is living on the same planet as 12 million other Pennsylvanians. Rendell appears to be the governor of the state of dementia.
Rendell, the former Philadelphia mayor, Democratic National Committee chairman and supporter of Hillary Clinton, has completed three full years as Pennsylvania governor.
During his tenure, state spending has grown to an astronomical $24.3 billion a year. And what are Pennsylvania taxpayers getting for their money? The state's economy is bleeding (the Washington, D.C.-based Cato Institute gave Rendell and "F" for his economic policies). Pennsylvania taxpayers, especially the elderly, are losing their homes because they can't afford burdensome property taxes. Rendell has made property tax relief his primary goal in each of his first three years as governor but failed to deliver on his promise three years in a row.
Pennsylvania roads are crumbling or choked with traffic. Thousands of young people are leaving the state for better opportunities elsewhere, while tons of garbage from surrounding states flows into Pennsylvania. Corruption, greed and incompetence seem to be the three words most frequently associated with Pennsylvania government.
Rendell promised a "new Pennsylvania" when he took office in 2003. Many voters fell for Rendell's empty promises.
Pennsylvania was the No. 2 importer of out-of-state garbage when Rendell took office. Today, Pennsylvania is the nation's No. 1 importer of trash. Rendell has turned Pennsylvania into the nation's dumping ground.
Pennsylvania continues to have the worst roads in the country, according to annual surveys of truckers. The state's bridges are falling down. Rendell's own transportation department says the state needs to spend $500 million in each of the next 20 years to repair deteriorating bridges. And let's not forget that Rendell siphoned $530 million in federal highway funds to keep buses and trains running in Philadelphia (and keep those Democratic-voting transit workers happy).
Rendell campaigned on a platform to overhaul education in Pennsylvania. He's had three education secretaries in three years. It's hard to develop a plan to improve schools when your Education Department is a revolving door.
Rendell signed a $1 billion increase in the state income tax in his first year. He pushed through casino gambling in his second year even though two-thirds of the state's residents oppose gambling. Rendell sold the slots bill as a way to fund public education. The companion legislation to fund the schools, Act 72, was rejected by four-fifths of the state’s 501 school districts. Even if the school districts had approved Act 72, it's obvious that gambling revenues would not bring in enough to fund the state's public schools.
So why will Pennsylvania soon be home to 61,000 slot machines? One might ask Rendell to explain why he has collected millions in campaign contributions from the gambling industry. What is the gambling industry getting for its money? Who has the governor's ear? Pennsylvania taxpayers or casino owners?
Rendell didn't do too much damage in his third year as governor. The only tax increase he could get approved was the $52 emergency services tax that almost all communities now take from the paychecks of workers.
But let's not forget Rendell's biggest achievement of 2005. He signed into law the infamous 16 percent to 54 percent pay raises for legislators, judges and other state politicians, including the governor. Rendell had an opportunity to side with the state's beleaguered taxpayers and veto the pay hike. He signed it anyway and praised the pay raise. It wasn't until Pennsylvanians started booing Rendell at county fairs that he realized he had stepped in manure.
Rendell did find time in December to veto legislation that would have saved Pennsylvania businesses and workers $1.1 billion over the next five years. Why did Rendell oppose the tax cuts? He said the legislation would reduce the amount of money the state had to spend. Duh. That's the idea of a tax cut. Less money for government to waste.
Rendell has also failed to curb "for-profit" insurance giants from raising rates by 20 percent to 30 percent every year. Two bills before the state Legislature are stuck in committee because the insurance lobby doesn't want them passed. Rendell and his insurance secretary, who is supposed to be looking out for Pennsylvania taxpayers, have been silent on this issue for three years.
Rendell promised to increase Pennsylvania's minimum wage, which has been at $5.15 since 1996. Three years into his term, he has failed to deliver on that promise. He even announced that he would never sign the pay raise unless it included an increase in the minimum wage. He signed the pay raise anyway.
Rendell has pardoned more criminals in his first three years as governor than any other Pennsylvania governor has done over the same time frame.
If you're a Pennsylvania resident who still feels the need to re-elect Rendell, look at it this way: A vote for Rendell is a vote for higher taxes, under-funded schools, skyrocketing health insurance, more out-of-state garbage, crumbling roads and bridges, state-supported gambling and more pardons for criminals.
And here's a final reason Rendell (who moonlights for cable TV's Comcast as a commentator for Eagles football games) doesn't deserve re-election. He promised the Eagles would return to the Super Bowl in 2006 and win it all. So much for Rendell keeping his promises.
E-mail Tony Phyrillas at tphyrillas@pottsmerc.com
Tony Phyrillas
Columnist, The Mercury
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biography - Tony Phyrillas
Tony Phyrillas is an editor and columnist for a two-time Pulitizer Prize-winning newspaper in Pennsylvania. You can send him an e-mail at tphyrillas@pottsmerc.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read other commentaries by Tony Phyrillas.
Visit Tony Phyrillas's website at http://tonyphyrillas.blogspot.com
Copyright © 2006 by Tony Phyrillas
All Rights Reserved.
PING!
Fast Eddie is the only politician I've ever seen who makes used car salesmen look like choirboys in comparison.
Give it time. Jon Corzine will be worse.
Regards, Ivan
Never mind, I thought this was another article about Gregoire. Back to sleep.
The doctors are fleeing PA under attack from the crooked trial lawyer industry, led by shyster numero uno Rendell.
Fraudoire
Rendell promised a "new Pennsylvania" when he took office in 2003.
It's going to take him 8 yrs. instead of 4 to deliver on this promise and he's going to use most of the PA conservatives on FR to help him produce since they've all fallen for that "grassroots" group that is rumored to be financed by Soros telling them to toss all the Republicans in Harrisburg out and replace them with Democrats for passing that middle of the night pay raise. Never mind that Democrats voted for it too, or that he signed the bill, there's never any mention of replacing them. At the end of 8 yrs., he will change the name of PA, no, not to New PA, but to Massachusetts II.
Such a pity, it is such beautiful country, with so much potential and so much great history.
I'd leave if I could. Got family obligations here and need the great docs that we have left. I want to go to a right-to-carry state.
My husband is one of them who left in 1984. This is nothing new for PA. Sad thing is that once they leave the state, they do nothing but talk about being back there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.