[TBP]

This could be serious dnager for the Republican majority in Congress. They are fortunate to have the Dimmycraps for opponents. A serious, intelligent opposiiton could be a rel threat to hhe bunch of liberal incompetents who seem to run the Republican Party.

[Diddle E. Squat]

A new on-line poll

Statistically meaningless.

[neverdem]

dnager - that as well!

[A Balrog of Morgoth]

This could be serious dnager for the Republican majority in Congress. They are fortunate to have the Dimmycraps for opponents. A serious, intelligent opposiiton could be a rel threat to hhe bunch of liberal incompetents who seem to run the Republican Party.

If they were serious and intelligent, they wouldn't be Democrats.

[ladyinred]

It won't be the non stop lying bashing from the media, right? It will be because their own party is falling for the pro panda too? I think not.

[staytrue]

Similar story already posted here

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1569795/posts

[luvbach1]

I will never vote for a lib Demonrat so long as there is any difference between one and a "Republican."

[hsalaw]

I never heard of ConservativeHQ. I'll have to check it out. Thanks for the post. BTW, I'm not sure I agree with the doom-and-gloom conclusion: I can't see a conservative voting for, for example, Hillary, who's a confirmed socialist, just because he's mad at Pres. Bush's spending. Although, I confess, I did vote for Ross Perot because I was mad at BushI's tax increase, but I was young and stupid then.

[Desert_Girl]

hmmmm. What are the odds that online poll has been "freeped"?