Skip to comments.RNC Chief Ken Mehlman accepted political contributions from gay porn king?
Posted on 10/29/2006 2:41:00 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel
RNC CHIEF KEN Mehlman accepted political contributions from gay porn king?
Last week, you'll remember, the RNC, headed by Ken Mehlman, was running that race-baiting 'bimbo' ad against Rep. Harold Ford (D) down in Tennessee. One of the barbs in that ad was the claim that Ford had taken political contributions from "porn movie producers."
But it seems there is plenty of porn movie producer money to go around.
It turns out that the Republican National Committee is a regular recpient of political contributions from Nicholas T. Boyas, the owner and CEO of Marina Pacific Distributers, one of the largest producers and distributers of gay porn in the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at talkingpointsmemo.com ...
From the link:
"Some recent releases include "Fire in the Hole", "Flesh and Boners", even a "Velvet Mafia" series."
Well, you can't say the guy doesn't have a sense of humor...
OTOH, the blog's sponsors, with quotes like this:
"Help make George a lame duck." "Show George that America is sick and tired of GOP incompetence and failure."
cause me to suspect his motives.
Just some more pre-election spin. This guy probably gives to both paries and I would love to see the entire list of his political contributions for starters.
People in business up to an including the biggies like Disney, GM, Wal-Mart give money to both parties. Sort of protection money, I guess.
You wouldn't know from the name of the company what they do. I believe this story. It's a so what kind of thing. The RNC didn't take money from Man on Man Hot Monkey Love Action LLC.
The company's name is "Marina Pacific Distributors". Who here would have a clue as to who they were with that name?
So a gay porn producer is donating to Mehlman. He starts donating to Lindsay Graham, I'll call it a trend.
I meant so what in the sense that the RNC is not going to line item every single contribution of $250 from innocuous sounding companies. They likely had no idea who the company was unless they watched the said movies.
Does Marina Pacific Distributors sound like a pro-marriage group to you? You know that there are hundreds of thousands of different donors. Hvaing one bad apple is not a cause for alarm.
But nice try at trying to suppress GOP turnout, DUmmie.
Thank goodness, the people on FR can see beyond your fsux outrage.
BTW, what are doing hanging out and posting from a leftist site, anyway.
While his website seems to a ripoff of Bill O'Reilly's "Talkingpoint memo".
I don't know who this yahoo is or what his agenda is, but the ad was NOT race baiting (unless whoever saw it was/is a bigot) and NOWHERE in the ad (that I saw) did it mention anything about Ford accepting political contributions from "Porn Movie Producers."
I moved from VT to Virginia (which may not be the deep South, but it ain't Maine) and I've seen more interracial couples here--with 98% being black men/white women--than anywhere else I've ever lived or visited.
Moreover, it does not appear to be a problem.
Thus, why is it that when black men "choose" to date or marry white women, that's okay, and we never hear anything from the hypocritical Ford's in this country or their enabling MSM (or like this JERK), but when a political ad shows something which "MIGHT" mean Harold met a white lady and she suggests he call her, ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE?
Next time, don't forget the "barf alert."
Marshall is a neo-liberal. Blah.
But, this is a non story. $250 in a sea of donations is nothing. No reason for them to check every check. It would cost more money to research every donor than alot of the checks are worth.
Just some faux outrage form a liberal moonbat blogger.
You're right. Why should those homosexual hypocrites get away with this?
If a porn producer gives campaign contributions to the RNC to help elect more republicans, who then work through an aggressive legislative agenda to clean up the American cultural cesspool, with the goal of eliminating or at least marginalizing the porn industry - what's the problem?
You're the one who posted from the DUmmie like website and believed their crap 100%.
You know if the dems would have just said "so what about that commercial on Ford" the matter would have been dropped quick. Now more Tennesseans know about that commercial than they would have if all had been "So what". I think Republicans do a better job of ignoring nonsense. If the RNC as a whole receive money from this movie company...so what. Does that mean we approve of the movies? No. We are still going to vote Republican and ignore the fact that the company gave money. We are better off this way.
"cause me to suspect his motives."
Suspect? Just look at the disclaimer at the bottom of the screed:
"Let me say, for the record, that I consider pornography not only a legal but a morally unobjectionable product. People in that industry have as much right to participate in the political process as anyone else. And it's difficult for the head of a political committee or a candidate in a political campaign to know the background of every contributor. But hypocrisy blows. And on this issue, as on others, Ken Mehlman's a hypocrite."
Just another lying leftist scumbag.
you are absolutely correct....most of the time...these black men aren't look for wives...rather for the ho's & bee-itchs always rapped about in rap & hip hop "music"....
that is perfectly ok...and when they do th mtv videos to inculcate the next generation....that is not racism...
but put it out in a mild form with a black cnadidate just doing what all those videos and "rap music" scream about....and suddenly.....it is racism!!!!
BUT...It is not racism when harold ford's father commenting on his son's campaign and confronted by a white reporter....ford repeatedly calls him a "cracker".....
that is not racism!!!!!
"There's only so much hypocracy I am willing to take."
Perhaps you should consult your dictionary. It would only be hypocrisy if the Repubs *knew* who the guy was and took his money anyway. That's not even alleged here.
To acknowledge that it's difficult to know who every small donor is, then in the next breath accuse someone of hypocrisy anyway, is the sort of noxious dishonesty that only a demonrat or other leftist could stomach.
"those durn homos are going to hell"
That's exactly true, unless they repent of their wicked ways.
I can't find anything over at the FEC. Anyone found any data to back this up?
Dane, where'd you find the donor info?
What's next for the Democrats....assault and battery of gay people?
I searched it, and it showed 3700.00 in contributions in mostly 250 increments. Primarily to the RNC, although a CA Repub and McCain received 250.00
Here was the link, http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/qind/
but it is showing internal error now.
Thanks! Had anyone returned the donation/s? Even Hillie won't accept personal donations from Larry Flynt, though the DSCC is happy to take his money. Snort.
Search boyias, nicholas here. It will come up.
Thanks! Incorrect spelling at the FEC of the same guy?
I doubt the RNC knew this guy from Adam's housecat! Dems must be really desperate for something to save Webb's butt.
That is odd. My same search gave two different results....hmmmmmm.
"You shore got purty lips..."
Say it isn't so! Surely all the gay pedophiles will go to heaven and be met by Barney Frank and Hillary Clinton at the gate.
FWIW, Christie Hefner's name is mispelled in the FEC database, too, in at least a couple of places. Go figure.
I guess the Dumocrats have forgotten when they made a hero out of Larry Flynt. Geez: they keep getting lower and lower.
Thanks, I should have known correct spelling by a gov't agency is really too much to ask for.....
While on campaignmoney.com a Nicholas Boyias from Chatsworth, CA(about 20 miles west of North Hollywood, CA,) gave about $1,000 total to the national and California RNC.
So this can be a case of two different nicholas boyias, giving to 2 different campaigns.
Well, to be fair, it might not (just) be the FEC. Could be the author of this article. I googled Boyias and got more hits (most of which I did NOT want to check out if you get my drift) than I got with the spelling the author of the above article uses. I also looked up the graphics of the files at the FEC and those pics of the paperwork show the name spelled with the "i".
A big corporation secret:
Many of them have subsidiaries that own sub-subsidiaries that produce porn. Porn is a very profitable industry.
Oh please get off your perfection horse. They get thousands of checks every day and some bad apples are going to get through no matter what.
BTW, when you reach your perfect political world, how bout sending me a post card. JMO, that post card will a long time coming.
Probably the same guy. Lives in Chatsworth, does business in North Hollywood.
Do you have any idea of the databases both political parties have? They know who's got money. They know who's sending it. This is more about sticky fingers than ignorance.
I don't expect perfection. But I do think expecting a candidate to refuse money from porn perchants isn't too much to ask.
Better a porn king than the Chinese Communists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.