Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK Banks Bowing to Risk of Action from US on Iran
Counterrorismblog ^ | December 4, 2006 | Jonathan Winer

Posted on 12/04/2006 4:51:00 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

There is growing evidence that US pressure on Iran is having an impact on what had been Iran's major conduits to the rest of the world through the City of London. They seem to be pulling out of Iran-related business right and left. As one senior anonymous London banker is quoted as saying to The Independent, "The consequences of not toeing the American line on Iran have not been made clear, but we were left in no doubt that we might not want to find out."



TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: iran

1 posted on 12/04/2006 4:51:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All; DoctorZIn; Allegra; Marine_Uncle; Dog; SandRat; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; NormsRevenge
US tells banks to shut down Iran operations

***************************************EXCERPT****************************

By Andrew Murray-Watson

Published: 03 December 2006

Now we are doing something!

Several of the UK's largest banks fear they could face the full legislative wrath of the US government unless they bow to Washington's pressure to shut their operations in Iran.

It is believed that officials in President George Bush's administration have also put pressure on banks with operations in the US, including RBS, HSBC and Barclays, to stop acting on behalf of UK business customers in Iran. Barclays, it is thought, has already told its corporate clients that it will not accept deposits from transactions originating in Iran.

The finance director of an AIM-listed company with significant operations in Iran said: "Barclays told us that it is unable to act as our bank as far as Iran is concerned. We have not been told why." HSBC has said it will no longer accept dollar transactions from within Iran, while RBS declined to comment.

Although the UK banks involved are listed and incorporated in the UK, all have either a secondary listing or substantial operations in the US that makes them potentially vulnerable to US government action.

A senior executive at one of the banks affected said: "The consequences of not toeing the American line on Iran have not been made clear, but we were left in no doubt that we might not want to find out."

A spokeswoman for the US Treasury Department confirmed that meetings had taken place with senior UK bankers. However, she stressed that the talks had been set up so that US government officials could "equip banks with information" about the dangers of allowing Iran to remain part of the international financial community.

Business leaders in the UK have grown increasingly worried that they might fall foul of US legal or regulatory censure for actions that take place in the UK or in another country. It emerged last month that American victims of terrorist attacks were pursuing civil actions against US subsidiaries of NatWest and Crédit Lyonnais on the grounds that their parent companies provided banking facilities in the UK and France for charities that the US Treasury Department believes has links to Hamas, the militant Palestinian organisation.

The US has imposed unilateral sanctions on Iran - because of its alleged support for international terrorism - and individuals found to have breached the economic restrictions face a fine of up to $250,000 (£126,000) and 20 years in jail.

Several of the UK's largest banks fear they could face the full legislative wrath of the US government unless they bow to Washington's pressure to shut their operations in Iran.

It is believed that officials in President George Bush's administration have also put pressure on banks with operations in the US, including RBS, HSBC and Barclays, to stop acting on behalf of UK business customers in Iran. Barclays, it is thought, has already told its corporate clients that it will not accept deposits from transactions originating in Iran.

The finance director of an AIM-listed company with significant operations in Iran said: "Barclays told us that it is unable to act as our bank as far as Iran is concerned. We have not been told why." HSBC has said it will no longer accept dollar transactions from within Iran, while RBS declined to comment.

Although the UK banks involved are listed and incorporated in the UK, all have either a secondary listing or substantial operations in the US that makes them potentially vulnerable to US government action.

A senior executive at one of the banks affected said: "The consequences of not toeing the American line on Iran have not been made clear, but we were left in no doubt that we might not want to find out."


2 posted on 12/04/2006 4:55:27 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Didn't we do something similar to NK, it seems familiar.

Do you know?

Thanks!
3 posted on 12/04/2006 5:36:35 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The UK banks and business leaders only need to look at France and see what the American people can do with boycott French products and refusal to travel in France.

The great French wine industry has been destroying grapes and pouring wine out to make room for more wine that will not sell.


4 posted on 12/04/2006 5:43:56 PM PST by Grampa Dave (The Bush haters on both sides have elected the government they have dreamed of!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Time to but ones toes on one side of the line or the other. Two much double dealing going on. As the frigen clever Mullahs discover all their sources of money will slowly dry up whether hard currency, stock/bond funds, bank loans, whatever, you will see them figure out how to dump Mahmoud Ahmadinajab and seek a non-sectarian president and cabinet.
The problem all along has been these Mullahs run things in the background to get rich and live the good life at the expense of their country, while they appear to maintain a religious mask. There a pack of thieves and evil doers of the first class.
5 posted on 12/04/2006 5:53:19 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson