Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A devil food is turning our kids into homosexuals
World Net Daily ^ | Dec 12, 2006 | Jim Rutz

Posted on 12/12/2006 5:28:00 PM PST by Stone Mountain

A devil food is turning our kids into homosexuals

Posted: December 12, 2006

1:00 a.m. Eastern

There's a slow poison out there that's severely damaging our children and threatening to tear apart our culture. The ironic part is, it's a "health food," one of our most popular.

Now, I'm a health-food guy, a fanatic who seldom allows anything into his kitchen unless it's organic. I state my bias here just so you'll know I'm not anti-health food.

The dangerous food I'm speaking of is soy. Soybean products are feminizing, and they're all over the place. You can hardly escape them anymore.

I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you're also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.

Estrogens are female hormones. If you're a woman, you're flooding your system with a substance it can't handle in surplus. If you're a man, you're suppressing your masculinity and stimulating your "female side," physically and mentally.

In fetal development, the default is being female. All humans (even in old age) tend toward femininity. The main thing that keeps men from diverging into the female pattern is testosterone, and testosterone is suppressed by an excess of estrogen.

If you're a grownup, you're already developed, and you're able to fight off some of the damaging effects of soy. Babies aren't so fortunate. Research is now showing that when you feed your baby soy formula, you're giving him or her the equivalent of five birth control pills a day. A baby's endocrine system just can't cope with that kind of massive assault, so some damage is inevitable. At the extreme, the damage can be fatal.

Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality. That's why most of the medical (not socio-spiritual) blame for today's rise in homosexuality must fall upon the rise in soy formula and other soy products. (Most babies are bottle-fed during some part of their infancy, and one-fourth of them are getting soy milk!) Homosexuals often argue that their homosexuality is inborn because "I can't remember a time when I wasn't homosexual." No, homosexuality is always deviant. But now many of them can truthfully say that they can't remember a time when excess estrogen wasn't influencing them.

Doctors used to hope soy would reduce hot flashes, prevent cancer and heart disease, and save millions in the Third World from starvation. That was before they knew much about long-term soy use. Now we know it's a classic example of a cure that's worse than the disease. For example, if your baby gets colic from cow's milk, do you switch him to soy milk? Don't even think about it. His phytoestrogen level will jump to 20 times normal. If he is a she, brace yourself for watching her reach menarche as young as seven, robbing her of years of childhood. If he is a boy, it's far worse: He may not reach puberty till much later than normal.

Research in 2000 showed that a soy-based diet at any age can lead to a weak thyroid, which commonly produces heart problems and excess fat. Could this explain the dramatic increase in obesity today?

Recent research on rats shows testicular atrophy, infertility and uterus hypertrophy (enlargement). This helps explain the infertility epidemic and the sudden growth in fertility clinics. But alas, by the time a soy-damaged infant has grown to adulthood and wants to marry, it's too late to get fixed by a fertility clinic.

Worse, there's now scientific evidence that estrogen ingredients in soy products may be boosting the rapidly rising incidence of leukemia in children. In the latest year we have numbers for, new cases in the U.S. jumped 27 percent. In one year!

There's also a serious connection between soy and cancer in adults – especially breast cancer. That's why the governments of Israel, the UK, France and New Zealand are already cracking down hard on soy.

In sad contrast, 60 percent of the refined foods in U.S. supermarkets now contain soy. Worse, soy use may double in the next few years because (last I heard) the out-of-touch medicrats in the FDA hierarchy are considering allowing manufacturers of cereal, energy bars, fake milk, fake yogurt, etc., to claim that "soy prevents cancer." It doesn't.

P.S.: Soy sauce is fine. Unlike soy milk, it's perfectly safe because it's fermented, which changes its molecular structure. Miso, natto and tempeh are also OK, but avoid tofu.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; gay; gayagenda; health; homosexualagenda; jimrutz; queertheory; soy; testosterone; tofu; truth; wnd; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-188 last
To: lepton
Better watch out, or you'll become feminine.

Actually I think the opposite has happened - I seem to spend my days in work boots and jeans. Both my husband and daughter like seeing me in skirts and heels :)

181 posted on 12/13/2006 6:45:29 PM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Mase
So why do you dismiss anyone else's opinions and/or research, that does not support the FDA's, as charlatan's etc.?
182 posted on 12/14/2006 6:00:46 AM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Jim Rutz to soy: "You're the devil!"

Uh, okay, Jim.

/sarc

183 posted on 12/14/2006 6:03:57 AM PST by Silly (plasticpie.com, home of Silly humor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9
I don't dismiss everyone. Only those who employ faulty research methodology and those who use that research to further their own political or financial ends. You need to understand that most research today is done to find grant money and not the truth. Also, most of the message today is controlled by extremists who also have a political and/or financial agenda.

To separate what's legitimate from all the nonsense out there requires a substantial education in biochemistry and nutrition as well as having worked in real world situations where the accuracy of your research determines your success in industry. Too many people are quick to believe whatever they see on the internet because it sounds like the researchers know what they're talking about. Most of the time, after critically reviewing the research, it's clear that their conclusions -- although they may show correlations -- don't prove a thing. 95% of research today is meaningless. Mercola is an internet charlatan who is getting rich selling people crap that doesn't perform as advertised. He's been cited several times by the FDA for doing so. The Weston Price Foundation is another organization that's driven by a political agenda and cares nothing about the truth. Fortunately, the FDA, most of the time, creates policy based on sound science. That's reassuring to me in a world filled with food Nazi's, toxic terrorists and nanny staters.

184 posted on 12/14/2006 8:08:38 AM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Mase
A condescending liberal attitude really doesn't add anything to a discussion.
185 posted on 12/15/2006 4:49:12 AM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: dcnd9
Is that all you've got? I suggested earlier that you believed in something you didn't understand and couldn't explain. You had ample opportunity to prove me wrong and didn't even try. Looks like I was right. Only conservatives believe in things that don't exist? I suppose if you really knew anything about the subject you'd contribute something to the discussion. Instead, all you've done is link us to wacko websites. Nice defense.
186 posted on 12/15/2006 8:39:23 AM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Mase

For those who believe no explanation is needed. For those who don't, no explanation will suffice.
Since I read you as the latter, there was no point in trying to prove "your opinions" wrong.


187 posted on 12/15/2006 3:06:40 PM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Personally, I would suspect that childhood obesity has more to do with early menstruation than does soy consumption.


188 posted on 12/15/2006 3:17:09 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-188 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson