Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starving toddlers mistaken for “healthy eating”
Junkfood Science ^ | 4/15/08 | Sandy Szwarc

Posted on 04/16/2008 6:34:48 AM PDT by ZGuy

First, there were growing reports of school children being underfed and not getting enough calories, fats and sugars to enable them to grow well and learn, as a result of efforts to feed them ‘healthy’ foods. Now, an investigation of nursery preschools has uncovered tragic findings: nearly all nurseries are feeding toddlers so little fat and calories, and such excessive amounts of 'healthy' fiber, fruits and vegetables, that they are putting the children at risk for stunted growth and nutritional deficiencies. Mistaken beliefs about healthy eating are now endangering our youngest children.

A terribly disturbing study was released a few weeks ago by Trading Standards, which is responsible for enforcing the UK’s food legislation and ‘healthy eating’ agenda. The media widely portrays — and it is popularly believed — that children are eating vast amounts of fats, sugars, salts and calories and nearly no fruits and vegetables. Nutritional analyses were done on a week’s worth of meals served in every nursery preschool in East Sussex, expecting to confirm these unhealthy eating practices and support the government’s ‘healthy eating’ initiatives.

Amelia Hill of the Observer was the only reporter to write about the findings and the concerns raised in this investigative study. We’ll begin with her article.

As she notes, adult guidelines have recommended diets high in fiber, low in fat, with plenty of fruits and vegetables as the principles of healthy eating. However...

Fruit and veg diet 'danger for toddlers'

...nurseries are being told the food they serve in accordance with these guidelines is unsuitable for toddlers and could lead to vitamin deficiencies and even stunted growth. 'Nurseries are applying the principles of adult healthy eating to the food they are supplying to young children,' said Sarah Almond, a consultant specialist paediatric dietician who has analysed the results of a trading standards study into nursery food.

'We expected the study to show nurseries were serving children food that was too high in calories, fat, saturated fat and salt, and low in vegetables and fruit. Instead, we found that the majority of nurseries had gone to the other extreme and appeared to be providing food that was too low in calories, fat and saturated fat, and too high in fruit and vegetables.' This situation was putting children at the risk of developing nutritional deficiencies, she said.

The research also found that four out of five nurseries were giving children portions that were too small and only three in 10 provided them with meals containing enough calories. According to Almond... pre-school children have a high energy and nutrient requirement. Because they have a small stomach and a relatively under-developed gut, they cannot consume large quantities of food at a time but need frequent small meals and snacks throughout the day. In addition, too much fibre - such as that absorbed through over-consumption of fruit and vegetables - can result in insufficient intake of other food groups and inhibit the absorption of key minerals. 'Because a significant number of children attend nurseries from 7am until 7pm, the food and nutrition they receive there are key to their health,' said Almond...

A campaign director at the Preschool Learning Alliance told the Observer that “the majority of nurseries are confused or misinformed about what entails healthy eating... over-focusing on the message about eating five portions of fruit and vegetable a day.” Most childcare workers, parents and even policy makers don’t realize that growing children have vital needs for calories, fats, carbohydrates, sugars, protein and other nutrients.

The seriousness of the dangers for toddlers revealed in these nutritional analyses went beyond the fact that 7 out of the 10 nurseries were not even giving the toddlers enough calories to eat. All but 2 of the nurseries were not providing even the minimal amounts of fats the children needed for healthy neurological and brain development. It also appears meat and fortified cereals were virtually eliminated from the menus and all of the nurseries failed to meet basic requirements for iron, for example. Protein was similarly inadequate and only three of the nurseries even offered tuna fish or some type of fish even once a week. These findings are believed to be an accurate reflection of the national picture.

The results even troubled Councilor Bob Tidy, Lead Cabinet Member for Community Services. In a public statement he said nurseries “have to change their thinking about what constitutes healthy eating for the under fives.” They face difficulties making the needed changes, however, he said, because of “having to accommodate the demands of parents, who often have very specific viewpoints of what they will and will not allow their children to consume and their own perceptions of healthy eating which may not be appropriate for children of this age group.”

As Fiona MacRae wrote today in the Daily Mail, “in today’s health-obsessed society, parents are made to feel guilty if they do not feed their children a diet packed with fiber-rich fruits and vegetables.” These are the ‘healthy’ foods that young parents are being told their toddlers “should” be eating.

These are also precisely the types of diets of concern to growing numbers of pediatric medical professionals who are seeing increasing numbers of children suffering nutritional shortfalls, failing to thrive and falling behind on growth, as a result of unsupported beliefs about healthy eating. Parents are restricting fats, sugars, salts and calories and increasing fruits and vegetables, wrongly believing they can prevent their children from becoming fat or developing heart disease and becoming junkfood dependent. Sadly, these diets do none of those things, nor are they healthy for children.

Very few parents of toddlers have probably ever heard that the National Academy of Sciences has recommended children get as much as 40% fat in their diets every day, or that high fiber, low-calorie diets don’t enable young children to get the calories they need, and high-fiber diets inhibit the absorption of many nutrients.

The intense marketing of ‘healthy’ foods to parents and daycare centers and preschools may be the most disturbing revelation of just how pervasive unsound nutrition information has become.

High-fiber drinks for toddlers

High-fiber fruit drinks are being marketed to parents — with a special discount program for daycare centers and preschools — as being “healthier drink options for young children.” Developed by food scientists at the International Food Network at Cornell, these high fiber drinks are promoted as providing “all the benefits of organic whole grains and 100% fruit juice.” They’re said to be better than juice or milk because they provide “fiber and whole grain nutrients.” The promotional material claims:

Whole grains and fiber have been clinically proven to prevent heart disease and cancers. With the obesity epidemic raging in our youth, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, diabetes and cancers are showing up in children at younger and younger ages. Adopting nutritionally sound eating habits from the start that include the incorporation of more whole grains in the diet of children throughout the day will set them on the path for better lifelong health.

These drinks are reconstituted fruit juice, sweetened with “organic brown rice syrup” and supplemented with rice bran for fiber. There is no evidence to recommend high-fiber bran for toddlers or, as we've examined at length, that such diets in young children will prevent obesity or adult-onset chronic diseases of aging.

Calorie counting for toddlers

Or, perhaps you caught the unsettling health news on television or the syndicated article this past week promoting “Calorie Bargains for Babies, Toddlers and Children.”

Calorie counting for babies! The story featured low-calorie, ‘healthy’ foods, such as a high-fiber energy bar containing organic fruits and vegetables, brown rice syrup and grains ($14.49 for 12 bars). The news story also promoted “Itsy Bitsy Yoga” for 18 months to 5 years of age — a program of 50 yoga poses for tiny tots that the author promises will ensure “fewer tantrums, better and longer sleep, increased motor coordination, improved listening and ability to follow directions, better self-expression, higher self-esteem and easier relaxation.”

As JFS readers are well familiar, there is no evidence or any expert medical body that recommends calorie-counting diets for babies, toddlers and preschoolers, nor supports the claims made for baby yoga. The story was written by a diet book author and personal trainer who founded Integrated Wellness Solutions. According to its website, it creates online software that integrates the “latest scientific and behavioral nutritional research and... is used by insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and other large corporations.”

With so much unsound information about healthy eating surrounding parents today and so many interests eager to cash in on the healthy eating movement, it’s little wonder that young parents have been swept up. But, it isn’t 'junkfood' that most threatens the physical and psychological health and wellbeing of children today. Tragically, it appears to be the so-called ‘healthy’ stuff.


TOPICS: Food; Health/Medicine; Science
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/16/2008 6:34:48 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

We’ve got anorexic teens, underfed toddlers, and obese kids. Part of this is silly parents who don’t know how to raise children, but part of this is the mentality that “everybody needs my help” fostered by the do-gooders. I think they’ve rigged the system so that no one qualifies as “normal” now.


2 posted on 04/16/2008 6:39:11 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

I am so sick and tired of hearing about organic food and how it’s supposedly better than food that doesn’t contain E.Coli bacteria. The biggest problem we ave today is that there is no solid, stable standard that we can use as a guide to healthy living. It’s all about the latest trendy diet method.


3 posted on 04/16/2008 6:51:22 AM PDT by Niuhuru (Don't burn a bra, burn a feminist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Who gives a rats behind what some liberal whacko’s say?

Do my kids look healthy? Do they have energy and are they growing? Are they happy? They seen a doctor I trust and she says they are doing well.

Don’t trust the school or the daycare with ensuring your child is getting a balanced diet. Take care of that yourself, JMHO.


4 posted on 04/16/2008 6:56:12 AM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“Don’t trust the school or the daycare ...”

Some of us would like to end the sentence there!

The nanny state do gooders are taking a beating this month. I even saw a story about how there is no health benefit to drinking 8 glasses of water a day (overlooking the exercise that you get by walking to the bathroom, of course). Now, fats and sugars are good for kids. What’s next? Has global warming stopped?


5 posted on 04/16/2008 7:06:53 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Babies and young children need cholesterol for proper brain development. They need fats in their diet.


6 posted on 04/16/2008 7:10:15 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

“What’s next? Has global warming stopped?”

No it hasn’t stopped. Of course something has to start before it can stop.


7 posted on 04/16/2008 7:21:09 AM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

“Babies and young children need cholesterol for proper brain development. They need fats in their diet.”

And I need a nice thick porterhouse in mine.


8 posted on 04/16/2008 7:21:48 AM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

EVERYBODY needs some fat in their diet.


9 posted on 04/16/2008 7:24:18 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

The diet toddlers and small children need would induce cardiac arrest in an adult. My kiddo gets whole milk (sometimes chocolate milk), pasta, breaded chicken, hamburgers, etc. She loves bread. She also runs at top speed wherever she goes, rather than walking. She’s also not overweight.

Lance Armstrong, arguably one of the more fit humans on the planet, once tried to keep up with a 3-year-old to see if he could do it. He allegedly gave up after 20 minutes. Like was noted elsewhere in this thread, little kids use food differently from adults. They burn through even high-calorie diets ridiculously fast.


10 posted on 04/16/2008 7:54:15 AM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
I think that the medical profession has a skewed view of what is normal and healthy - they are exposed to all the propaganda about fat and cholesterol, they think any is bad, and none is best.
11 posted on 04/16/2008 8:01:01 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

“a significant number of children attend nurseries from 7am until 7pm...”

Is this true? If so, I find it sad; what kind of bonding can happen when children are away from their parents this long every day?


12 posted on 04/16/2008 8:22:01 AM PDT by dr.zaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

When (and how) did proper nutrition for children become lost knowledge?


13 posted on 04/16/2008 8:26:39 AM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I think they’ve rigged the system so that no one qualifies as “normal” now.

Well, if you don't need their help, I reckon they would say that isn't normal...Catch-22

14 posted on 04/16/2008 8:48:44 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper

Politically correct death by starvation.


15 posted on 04/16/2008 9:08:55 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

The pediatrician told me, with a straight face no less, that my husband and I needed to start feeding our son low-fat/non-fat foods - nothing full-fat anymore. He’s 2. Since my kid was screaming from his finger getting pricked, I left the issue alone, but I absolutely won’t feed him anything but normal, whole foods.


16 posted on 04/16/2008 3:18:05 PM PDT by coop71 (Being a redhead means never having to say you're sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson