The NY Times Still Doesn't Know Who Won In Sadr City

The Virginian/NY Times ^ | 5/17/2008 | Moneyrunner

[moneyrunner]

From the NY Times: Truce Holds in Sadr City Amid Iraqi Army Patrols by ALISSA J. RUBIN

BAGHDAD — Iraqi Army troops moved a few blocks north of the fortified front line in Baghdad’s Sadr City district without incident on Saturday, signaling that a shaky truce with the cleric Moktada al-Sadr’s Shiite militia was holding. Let’s see if we can give them a hint. The Iraqi army is patrolling Sadr City.

In Mosul, another Sadr stronghold, the Iraqi army is arresting wanted men. That’s what happens when the fighting is over; you start arresting people instead of shooting them.

Members of Sadr’s staff are helping the Iraqi army.

IEDs are being identified, located and removed.

Sadr is still in Iran, but has created his “surrender team.”

So let’s tally it up and think about who may possibly be in charge.

Apparently the NY Times is so committed to defeat that even if Sadr shot himself and had his body burned in his bunker, they would tell you he is stronger than ever

[Diogenesis]

"Members of Sadr’s staff are helping the Iraqi army New York Times as stringers"

There, fixed it.

[moneyrunner]

Thanks. Hope you won't mind if I use the last one? I posted it on my blog and credited you.

[Diogenesis]

If only the American public would learn how useless (except to enemies of America)
the MSM are, as you have.

BEHIND ENEMY LINES

---

[stockpirate]

Hell the NYT still thinks we lost the Tet Offensive