Posted on 06/19/2008 9:11:32 AM PDT by Winged Hussar
Apparently, it is OK for Mr. Obama to be associated with terrorists like William Ayers or racists like Jeremiah Wright, but God forbid somebody would call him a Muslim! No, he won't stand for that kind of smear! We admit that most terrorists are Muslims, but most Muslims are not terrorists and the statement on Mr. Obama's website is insulting to hundreds of millions of people.
How could a man who discards his family heritage in favor of political expediency be even considered for presidency of the United States? Where are all the so-called "Islamic civil rights groups" like CAIR, MPAC, ISNA, MAS, etc. who are quick to defend every Islamic terrorist, but are silent when Muslims in general are being denigrated? We sincerely doubt that.
Muslims Against Sharia demand immediate removal of "SMEAR: Barack Obama is a Muslim" statement from the official Barack Obama's website as well as an apology for giving the word "Muslim" a negative connotation.
Source: Fight The Smears
Updates: Muslim Barack Obama fans told to hide from television cameras [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/barackobama/2152821/Muslim-Barack-Obama-fans-told-to-hide-from-television-cameras.html] Muslims barred from picture at Obama event [http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11168.html] Muslim Women Receive Apology From Obama Staff - Not Good Enough
Update for dummies: Do we think Obama is a Muslim? - No Do we think Obama was a Muslim? - Highly unlikely Do we care one way or the other? - No
...it doesn't change the fact that "SMEAR: Barack Obama is a Muslim" statement is a manifestation of anti-Muslim bigotry.
(Excerpt) Read more at muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com ...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/barackobama/2152821/Muslim-Barack-Obama-fans-told-to-hide-from-television-cameras.html "Barack Obama's campaign has been forced to apologise to two Muslim women barred from sitting behind him at a public event."
Suppose the following took place. Someone says that a white candidate had a Negro great-grandparent, and the candidate puts up a "Fight the Smears" page that says: "SMEAR: So-and-so is part Negro."
Another viewpoint: my religious identity is Jewish. Suppose I'm running for office, and someone says I am really a Christian. What is the difference between the following statements?
(1) "Winged Hussar is not a Christian even though he acknowledges Christianity as a positive force for guiding human behavior."
(2) "SMEAR: Winged Hussar is a Christian."
Obviously, #2 says there is something wrong with being a Christian because the allegation is a "smear." The line "SMEAR: So-and-so is part Negro" similarly implies that there is something wrong with being a Negro. Obama's own Web page is therefore derogatory of Muslims.
Note that Obama did not say "SMEAR: Obama is an Islamic supremacist," which would indeed be a smear. He said "SMEAR: Obama is a Muslim."
"Muslim Barack Obama fans told to hide from television cameras"-- suppose it was "Negro McCain fans told to hide from television cameras," or "Jewish Lieberman fans with yarmulkes told to hide from television cameras."
"Muslims barred from picture at Obama event"--right, Obama tosses Muslim-Americans under the bus the way Theodore Bilbo would have tossed African-Americans under the bus a hundred years ago.
This is what happens when you play identity politics.
Oh, what a tangled web we weave.
LOL
“Muslims Against Sharia”
Large group I am sure. 2? 3? members
Stage 1:
Start immigrating - move into a country quietly
Stage 2:
Begin starting churches: “learning centers”
community helps: food etc.
Stage 3:
Political activism: demanding rights, denounce
derogatory comments/press etc.
Stage 4:
Get elected, pass laws favoring rights etc. move toward
political majority
Stage 5:
Political control, Sharia Law
But irrespective of his religious affilitions, Obama is an abject marxists and militant anti-American.
ALL the first christians WERE Jews..
After that for 2000 years, many christians continued to be Jews..
Currently many Jews ARE christians..
Jesus was, is and will continue to be A JEW..
Yet, Osama Hussein meets with islamic agents of terrorism.
SMEAR: Obama has white blood cells in his veins. < /s >
What a creepy picture.
But he could be, right?
Obama and wife are no more Christian than Osama Bin Laden.
His support for abortion disqualifies him without looking any further. If you chose to look a little further, it only gets worse! He is not a Christian!!!
The short answer is he believe in Christ but doesn’t CLING to religion or let it affect his politics on issues like abortion and homosexuality.
Obama is a mixed up person.
He has a idenity problem.
He never recovered.
That’s why he is hiding his family background. He is trying to be picture perfect for the American voters. He wants the public to think he is the next Messiah. People better wake up before they vote for someone who is insecure and gets the most powerful position in the world....POTUS.
obamba doesn’t like muslims?
Dukakis called Dan Quayle “J. Danforth Quayle” throughout the debates, trying to paint Quayle as an elitest with a name like that. George Bush (the elder) rightly called him on this. But what if McCain or his veep in the debates called Obama “B. Hussein Obama?” Of course the point is, why would you want to run from your heritage instead of embracing it and being proud of it? Liberals don’t want to run as liberals (unless they’re from San Francisco) and running as a muslim or black is also apparently not in style when you still have to win over white America to win the general election. Obama is muslim and black (he was born a muslim and when born a muslim you are always a muslim and he is black, although soon you will see him playing up his “whiteness” too). He will not be able to hide his muslim heirtage anymore than he can hide his blackness and win or lose he should embrace it, not hide it. This shows a real weakness in this clown and I hope the American people (or should I say enough of the American people) are smart enough to see it.
Dukakis called Dan Quayle “J. Danforth Quayle” throughout the debates, trying to paint Quayle as an elitest with a name like that. George Bush (the elder) rightly called him on this. But what if McCain or his veep in the debates called Obama “B. Hussein Obama?” Of course the point is, why would you want to run from your heritage instead of embracing it and being proud of it? Liberals don’t want to run as liberals (unless they’re from San Francisco) and running as a muslim or black is also apparently not in style when you still have to win over white America to win the general election. Obama is muslim and black (he was born a muslim and when born a muslim you are always a muslim and he is black, although soon you will see him playing up his “whiteness” too). He will not be able to hide his muslim heirtage anymore than he can hide his blackness and win or lose he should embrace it, not hide it. This shows a real weakness in this clown and I hope the American people (or should I say enough of the American people) are smart enough to see it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.