Thanks, bvw. Good find.
Long; excerpted from:
http://www.democratic-disaster.com/index.php?topic=286.0
Excerpts:
These comments begin about three-fourths of the way down:
“There appears to be somewhat of an effort to contain this case and to keep it from the conservative Justices of the Supreme Court. Had the lower courts and the SCOTUS Clerk’s office done their job properly, this case, a bi-partisan case, would have landed at the feet of SCOTUS 5 days prior to the election.
-
If word doesn’t get out, it’s possible the case may not be forwarded to the rest of the US Supreme Court. Justice Suoter is NOT the person I wanted this case to go to, but he had right of first review under the rules. And the rules were not followed by the SCOTUS Clerk’s office who tried to convince me to drop the case. Suoter was supposed to read this on Monday, but the Stay Clerk didn’t give it to him until Thursday. Totally unethical.
-
This case was stopped. Why? I don’t have enough information to say who was behind it and why, but I know for a fact the case was not handled correctly. And I know that the law and the facts of this case have the ability to strip Obama of the Presidency.
I argued the same law as to McCain and Roger Colera as well, and I, I’m not backing down.
I need people to help spread the word about this case so that it has a chance of getting to Justice Clarence Thomas’s desk and to the rest of the Court.
-
The Supreme Court rules are clear. Under Rule 22(6), I was entitled to be informed of the disposition of my case by “appropriately speedy means”. Having submitted it on Monday, I heard NOTHING from Mr. Bickle by Thursday.
But he, a lousy Clerk, disposed of the case when he got it back on Monday, but refused to inform me. Why didn’t he inform me by “speedy means” that the case was not passed on to Justice Suoter?
This is NOT the way the US Supreme Court usually does business.”