Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

I know, I said I wouldn’t - but since this question came first, I will grant it my royal dispensation.

Another STUPID and childishly nitpicking question:
Blackstone defined Natural Born Subjects, but being citizens not subjects, any THINKING PATRIOT of the time was certainly able to ferret out the meaning of a natural born citizen from Blackstone’s definition of natural born subject...because, you see, he was defining “NATURAL BORN”, you imbecile, not “subject” nor “citizen”! Take my word for it, because you have already proven yourself unable to follow a structured, reasonable argument - so I won’t waste my fingertips.

BTW - if anybody other than rxsid wants to pursue the interesting questions regarding the “natural born” qualifier, I am happy to entertain and engage thoughtful, cogent, logical questions and arguments - but I will not suffer the kind of idiotic, playground tongue-sticking, thumbs-in-ears-finger-wagging, neener-neener waste of band width offered by rxsid in his last two.


9,394 posted on 07/21/2011 6:27:15 PM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9391 | View Replies ]


To: GilesB
Where did Sir William Blackstone define a citizen who was natural born?
9,397 posted on 07/26/2011 4:29:55 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9394 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson