Posted on 08/06/2008 3:56:35 PM PDT by pissant
Texas darlin is not the source. Techdude, a certified document forensics expert is, who first appeared on Pam Geller’s Atlas Shrugs website. There are others, including freeper Polarik, also a computer documents expert.
http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/default.aspx
Now if this proves to be true, how will the moonbats and the MSM bend over backwards to say the rules are antiquated and need to be ignored.
Remember when the MSM brought up McCain being born in the canal zone...
Cool. Now this thing looks right.
In the thread I started about Obamas COLB on another board I had a guy who doesn't even live in the US tell me that the law is stupid and needs to be gotten rid of.
“...She [Senator Obama’s mother] may well have been working as an undercover covert agent for the CIA at the time as well...”
Where do you get this weird idea? The woman is described by high school friends as a “fellow traveler”, an aetheist who had strong feelings for socialism and who hated the United States. Hardly the type the CIA would want, especially since her family were New Deal enthusiasts.
You say that she was working for a US Government agency: was it the US State Dept., at an Embassy, or a consulate? They have lots of left wingers and neo-socialists working there.
Thanks, Pissant. I just discovered that there’s a new benefit to such an exercise. The keyword CertifiGate is now outlined in Red Letters on the sidebar. (Sorry I forgot the HTML trick for getting the font color to change to red.)
That's a favorite front organization for field operatives.
Do you need more evidence?
Oh, yeah, after having seen several pictures of this lady I realized I own a copy of her weaving book, and I once met her at a party held by a gentleman named Ed Smidgal-tallings (various spellings BTW). He was writing a Malay (Bhassa) to English dictionary at the time ~ very intellectual crowd at that party too ~ one of a number of Ed's parties I'd attended.
Anyway, the place was crawling with Dutch, French, American and British field intelligence folks ~ as well as your usual bunch from World Bank and Postal Headquarters ~ and if you need to ask why ...... there's really no answer for it.
I'd say her Leftwingtard days were probably behind her, but more likely she found them less meaningful in her life than "doing good by working to help people in a real job". Else, she'd simply not been there with that particular crowd.
Unless she was spying for the Indonesians.
Thanks for the reference!
No pingy-dingy?
Sorry, I don’t have a ping list for Obamaramadingdang. I just wing it. I’ll try to remember to ping you. BTW, it seems techdude has been getting lots of harrassment. Either that or it is a convenient excuse not have to fight the critics.
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/11/techdude-update-2-from-atlas-shrugs/#more-1760
To be brutally honest, Pissant, I, like others who have tried replicate his work, cannot see where there is any "erased text." Plus, his claim that Maya's COLB was used to make the forgery runs counter to my claim that the forgery is a drop-dead clone of DeCosta's COLB -- a fact that TechDude dismissed as a "bizarre coincidence."
I'm defending his work because of my agreement with TD to give him the benefit of the doubt -- but as you saw the other day, I was pissed that my work was excluded from their "Exclusive--Breaking Story."
I never even got a chance to see it before it was posted.
Originally, TD, TechDude, and I were supposed to work jointly. But, then TechDude cut and ran to AtlasShruggs to get his own "Exclusive" report to the exclusion of my work and everyone else.
TD was not happy about him going renegade on us, but then she does the same thing with him, announcing that he found the "Smoking Gun," about two weeks after I published my "smoking gun (now cannon)."
Can both TechDude and myself be right? NO. Not the way he presented his results. It allows zero room for anything I did. Plus there are ideas that he ripped from mine without attribution.
At the end of the day, their is only one, true "smoking gun," whose ability to be replicated is easy and available. Not so with TechDude's complicated procedures.
Whatr can I say, but that only my findings are truly bullet-proof, incontrovertible, and undisputed. TechDude promised to deliver another report that gives the details of what he did so that it could be replicated by people who have no prior experience with Photoshop or GIMP. Personally, I would not hold my breath waiting for it because others in the audience ARE Photoshop savvy and they, too, could not reproduce what he found.
It's pretty hard for me to defend someone who co-opted my ideas and published work that is vulnerable to criticism.
So true.
We will know soon if the National Enquirer is on to this story and believes in this story. No better time than the Democrat Convention to publish the phony Birth Certificate story. I'm hoping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.