Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Free ThinkerNY; eleni121; Ziva

Thanks for posting; bump! BUMP!


4 posted on 08/10/2008 4:21:49 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PGalt
Guest Column: Ingrid Mattson vs. Freedom of Speech by Robert Spencer has the following:

"However, there are numerous indications in Mattson's article that free speech is precisely what she does not accept. When she says that "we do not have to agree with each other or love each other, but we have to afford respect to each other," she is not speaking of Muslims and their reactions to Wilders' film [Fitna]. Rather, she is referring to Wilders himself, as is clear from the sentence that follows: "This means that we do not deliberately try to humiliate each other." She clearly believes Wilders in creating the film Fitna, which offers violent quotations from the Qur'an and then shows Muslims acting upon them, was trying to humiliate Muslims: she claims that "Wilders has directed most of his hatred in recent years at Muslims," and says that "Wilders' actions are designed to hurt, offend, and even intimidate." She decries "the voices of self-proclaimed nationalists – really, racists – like Wilders, [who] often seem louder and more powerful because they are threatening.""

5 posted on 08/10/2008 4:30:55 PM PDT by Ziva (McCain could never make me vote for him... but Obama can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson