and she really looks like THIS?....
...SHE tries to make the pick of Sarah sexual? what a phony baloney AGING OLD HARPIE!!!
Posted on 10/24/2008 6:40:35 PM PDT by Wegotsarah.com
The late Democrat Senator Tip O’Neil is credited with one of the most widely repeated fundamental precepts in politics: "All politics are local." Stand aside Tip, you’ve been trumped by "conservative" blogger Kathleen "Ma" Parker who has set forth this seminal pronouncement; "All politics are sexual ".
That’s right! According to neo-Freudian Parker, Senator John McCain did not choose Gov. Sarah Palin because she would become the most electrifying conservative candidate since Reagan. No! According to Parker, the 73 year old McCain subconsciously sublimated all of his Presidential ambitions in choosing Gov. Sarah Palin because he had lust in his heart--or-- southern regions thereabout. Imagine--who would have thunk it? Horndog McCain, you little maverick devil you.
Yes, and now almost every heretofore unresolved question in politics makes perfect sense. Why did President George Bush pick the lightweight, Dan Quayle? Or, why did George W. Bush choose the inexperienced Condelezza Rice? Or, why did President Bill Clinton choose the remarkably unqualified Madeline Albright?
Well, thanks to the Parker Primal Political Doctrine, historians now have their answers. Clearly, George Bush lost in 1992, due to his passionate loyalty to the youthfully chiseled "boy toy" Quayle.
And Condelezza Rice? Certainly, George W. Bush knew she was inexperienced; but that only meant more frequent de-briefings. And as for Madeline Albright? Well, Bill Clinton knows his women, and he would probably echo Lyndon Johnson -"Until you’ve known Lady Byrd, you haven’t known a real women."
Unfortunately, one question does remain unresolved in my mind even in light of the sex obsessed Parker’s paradigm. Frankly, I can understand how Joe Biden would be attracted to the 'neat, intelligent and clean' Sen. Obama, but I can’t conceive of the converse. That concerns me as a voter. Perhaps Sen. Obama has low sexual self esteem? How will he fare in a private meaning with the very macho and virile Playgirl centerfold, Putin?
This is my third column on Parker. I hated writing all of them. But, I had to try to reveal that all this commentary from "conservative" females hissing out their venom at Sarah Palin was grounded in jealousy. Three weeks ago, I wrote that it was the "Sixth Deadly Sin-Envy" (below). But, I conceded that I could probably never prove that charge. But now it appears that I throughly underestimated the self-loathing of the bitter Ms. Parker and her ilk. With jealousy percolating so hotly within her, she finally just spewed it out.
In her most recent vitriol against Gov. Palin, Parker admits in the very first sentence- her husband was "hot" for Palin when he first laid eyes on her. Female red alert! Obviously, at that point, Parker sacrificed any intelligence and credibility she might have possesed, in order to scratch at the eyes of the woman who threatened her. Isn’t it ironic then, that Parker would argue that it was McCain who had foresaken his career and reputation based on bestial impulses?
We all grow old. The measure of an honorable soul is to accept the aging gracefully, and not begrudge those in their youth. I am not like Kathleen Parker, and therefore, I normally would not look to base a political argument on physical appearance. But, to make my point, I must call attention to the following two photographs: one as Kathleen Parker appears in today's Washington Post, and the other the current reality. To everything there is a season, Ms. Parker. A national commentator who would ask a Vice Presidential candidate to stand down, should not do so based on juvenile jealousies born of personal insecurities. (PHOTOGRAPHS ON SITE)
Ms. Parker, Ms. Noonan and other conservative writers who hate Gov. Palin for no other reason than spite or envy, debase themselves, not Gov. Palin. Their arguments fall on deaf ears. Their support for the liberal Senator Obama is based on one reality- their bitter, clinging, guttural envy of another person. This is not the stuff of elites, not the stuff of conservatives, not the stuff of superior intelligence- it’s the stuff of vipers.
And as for Kathleen Parker and Peggy Noonan- case closed.
and she really looks like THIS?.......SHE tries to make the pick of Sarah sexual? what a phony baloney AGING OLD HARPIE!!!
I really didn’t think kathleen parker could stoop much lower.......but she did.
Thanks for the help._:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.