Posted on 11/1/2008, 6:17:05 PM by Free ThinkerNY
Barack Obama's chief campaign strategist David Axelrod, once worked for a man who was an identified member of the Communist Party USA, a registered agent of the Soviet Union and a paid disseminator of Soviet black propaganda.
This man went on to become a key Chicago political fixer who helped elect communist linked politicians including the late Chicago mayor Harold Washington and former US Senator Carol Moseley Braun.
This man knew Barack Obama and was a key member of an organisation which endorsed Barack Obama in his 2004 US Senate race. Barack and Michelle Obama were active members of this organisation, which was once investigated by the FBI over claims of communist infiltration.
Who was this man? What was his background?
The individual in question was late Chicago lawyer David Simon Canter(1923/2004).
Born in Boston, David Canter was the son of Harry J Canter, an activist with the Industrial Workers of the World who later became secretary of the Boston Communist Party.
While the Communist Party candidate for Massachusetts secretary of state, Canter was arrested for carrying a placard "FULLER—MURDERER OF SACCO AND VANZETTI" " attacking Governor Fuller for the execution of anarchists Sacco and Vanzetti. Harry Canter was tried, convicted and jailed for a year for criminal libel in May 1929.
(Excerpt) Read more at newzeal.blogspot.com ...
Bookmarked and added to my “Democratic Traitor” folder.
This story needs to get out PRONTO! Send it to O’Reilly as a questionfor Obama and send it to Rush, Sean, Savage, Boortz, Levin, Beck, Laura, etc. to use on their shows.
Obama: the ultimate RDDB.
Fascinating. Bookmark for later. I wonder if Whittaker Chambers knew this Cantor fellow? Thanks for the post.
BTW, thank you for your service.
Likewise ... scarey as heck don’tchaknow!
Here’s another one to add to the list. Again, is there ANYONE that Obama knows/associates with/allies himself with that is does NOT display an anti-American, communist, Marxist, socialist worldview?
Tone, Truth, and the Democratic Party by Barack Obama Fri Sep 30, 2005 at 07:38:41 AM PDT Update [2005-9-30 10:38:41 by Armando]: From the diaries by Armando. Since it is not our normal practice to promote diaries from our representatives, I think I should explain why I chose to promote Senator Obama’s diary. Simply put, Sen. Obama’s diary addresses in substance an issue that has been a major focus of discussion in our community. Given the source, the topic and the specific thoughts, and the discussion sure to ensue, it is my judgment that promotion was the right thing to do.
I read with interest your recent discussion regarding my comments on the floor(1, 2, 3) during the debate on John Roberts’ nomination. I don’t get a chance to follow blog traffic as regularly as I would like, and rarely get the time to participate in the discussions. I thought this might be a good opportunity to offer some thoughts about not only judicial confirmations, but how to bring about meaningful change in this country.
Maybe some of you believe I could have made my general point more artfully, but it’s precisely because many of these groups are friends and...
This should be in news activism so more people can read what 0bama supposedly wrote on Sept 30, 2005 to his Senate diary!!! IMHO. And thx again admin moderator and filters for apparently deleting my posts as duplicate.
Notice the piece referenced above is included by a poster named ARM an DO on the daily KOS blog for that day.
If you are interested in the “Can this be Blog 48?” mentioned in the third comment section of the New Zeal blog, please send me a private email and I will send you the links and or what I have archived on my computer at this time.
Obama is looking more and more like the real 'manchurian candidate'!
0bama doesn’t have any “clean” past associations. I have never heard of a single one that hasn’t had to be hidden or sanitized. Not one single positive association that he can brag about. Amazing!
Speechless.
Wow. I hope this really gets Out There fast.
BTTT again. Needs to get Out There. (Maybe it is elsewhere but I haven’t seen it.)
Bookmarked for later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.