Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Phil Berg live on "call in show" SUNDAY January 11th
AntiMullah ^ | 01/08/09 | Mark McGrew via Antimullah

Posted on 01/08/2009 12:59:02 PM PST by FARS

TWO SUPREME COURT CASES ARE STILL PENDING AND COULD PREVENT OBAMA FROM BEING SWORN IN.

THE FIRST WILL BE VIEWED BY THE FULL COURT ON FRIDAY JANUARY 9TH WHERE THE CASE REQUESTS SCOTUS TO ORDER OBAMA TO PRODCUE HIS VAULT COPY OF THIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE (if one actually exists).

If he fails to comply, then on January 16th, the full court will view another lawsuit that would then suspend or negate the Congress certification of the Electoral Vote count and put the presidency in limbo.

Military's Duty to Obey Barry Soetoro aka Obama??

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/01/breaking-news-listen-toparticipate-phil.html

(Excerpt) Read more at antimullah.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 911truther; berg; bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; hollister; lawsuit; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; philipberg; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
This is the first posting of this on the Internet and provided to AntiMullah by Mark McGrew
1 posted on 01/08/2009 12:59:03 PM PST by FARS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FARS

Isn’t going to happen. Wish it would but it isn’t going to be heard. SCOTUS would be subject to death threats in mass by the crazy liberals if they stopped him from being President.


2 posted on 01/08/2009 1:01:56 PM PST by ritewingwarrior (Just say No to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS
The Supremes are getting ready to

Punt

3 posted on 01/08/2009 1:02:54 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spunky; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; 1035rep; 1curiousmind; 2ndDivisionVet; 4woodenboats; ...

You can also reach the Berg call in radio show at

http://antimullah.com

Permalink is

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/01/breaking-news-listen-toparticipate-phil.html


4 posted on 01/08/2009 1:03:13 PM PST by FARS (If time permits, visit http://antimullah.com after reading all of FR posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Err, “Breaking News”?


5 posted on 01/08/2009 1:08:35 PM PST by JennysCool (Internet Powerhouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Err, “Breaking News”?

errr broken news....cause the supremes will not prevent the first President of African extraction from being seated. Like it or not.

6 posted on 01/08/2009 1:11:17 PM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ritewingwarrior
Wish it would but it isn’t going to be heard. SCOTUS would be subject to death threats in mass by the crazy liberals if they stopped him from being President.

Amen to that. You remember the LA riots after the Rodney King verdict? Now multiply by every urban area in the United States.

7 posted on 01/08/2009 1:13:50 PM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Amen to that. You remember the LA riots Amen to that.

Bring it on. Lock and Load.

8 posted on 01/08/2009 1:30:20 PM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

.... add in the riots in Kenya and Indonesia .... They have a citizen/president in this dog fight too.


9 posted on 01/08/2009 1:31:01 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

“.... add in the riots in Kenya and Indonesia .... They have a citizen/president in this dog fight too.”

######

Well, I think I’ll just go ahead and riot as well, if the SCOTUS denies a president that is 50% European-American.


10 posted on 01/08/2009 1:34:21 PM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Does any serious person really think the swearing in will be blocked by the Supremes?


11 posted on 01/08/2009 1:40:21 PM PST by mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mono
Does any serious person really think the swearing in will be blocked by the Supremes?

No

12 posted on 01/08/2009 2:19:48 PM PST by wastedyears (In Canada, Santa says "Ho Ho, eh?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FARS
Military’s Duty to Obey Barry Soetoro aka Obama.

They are have no duty to obey if he isn't legitimate. They are sworn to protect the Constitution first.

13 posted on 01/08/2009 2:52:05 PM PST by mojitojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mono
Does any serious person really think the swearing in will be blocked by the Supremes?

No, I don't. I think his past will be revealed after he is sworn in and he will be impeached and arrested. I think the Supremes think that is far less troublesome. Then Biden takes over. Not good but by far the lesser of 2 evils.

14 posted on 01/08/2009 2:54:00 PM PST by mojitojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mono

precisley


15 posted on 01/08/2009 2:54:35 PM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ritewingwarrior

If that is how the Supreme Court makes its decision, we should fire them all immediately and convert the building into condos. Such as Supreme Court is useless, not to mention unworthy.


16 posted on 01/08/2009 3:35:53 PM PST by OneTimeComment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Congress certifited the vote today so I seriously doubt anything will be done now. I’d love it if I was pleasantly surprised but I’m not counting on that.


17 posted on 01/08/2009 3:41:11 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS

This case is really getting strong against Obama.

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244


18 posted on 01/08/2009 6:03:03 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba; All; Spunky; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; 1035rep; 1curiousmind; 2ndDivisionVet; ..

Friday 9th - SCOTUS reaction - will tell us a lot and then Jan 16th will be the final nail in somebody’s coffin. Remains to see in whose. The Constitution or Barry Soetora.

Listen/talk to Phil Berg on SUNDAY (11th) to hear full details of source and talk to Col. Hollister, too.

Check for details on http://antimullah.com (scroll down as needed)


19 posted on 01/08/2009 6:04:52 PM PST by FARS (If time permits, visit http://antimullah.com after reading all of FR posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeComment

If that is how the Supreme Court makes its decision, we should fire them all immediately and convert the building into condos.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

At first glance I read, “...convert the building to a **condom**! :)


20 posted on 01/08/2009 6:11:10 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson