Posted on 01/12/2009 5:34:10 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
Why resist the urge? They wouldn’t hesitate to slit your throat...
SCOTUS Just posted the bad news. Berg denied. Say goodbye to our Constitution.
But his mother was a natural born U.S. citizen.
You are missing the point. The question was, will the Chief Justice knowingly swear in a fraud?
Ah, if only that investigative reporter Fagan would delve into Obama’s skirting of the qualifications for the office of President of the United States in the same way he outed that criminal Levi Johnston, then Chief Justice Roberts would not need to as Obambi would resign in shame.
/sarc
A birth certificate is proof, and one has been provided.
I AM SORRY BUT PLEASE READ THIS! THE WIT IS DENIED BUT PLEASE EXPLAIN THE REST!!
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/011209zor.pdf
By doing what?
The guys you name have all committed previous crimes that would make them ineligible to run in the first place. Nor - I think we can all agree - are they U.S. citizens.
But your analogy isn’t valid in any case. Guys like that never are democratically elected. And whatever else we think of Obama, he’s not a mass murderer; nor is he likely to become one. So can we knock it off with the hyperbole?
"bo" is wrong. A natural born citizen is someone that has citizenship at birth. Parentage doesn't matter.
"Furthermore, the burden of proof is on the candidate, the DNC and the various Secretaries of State."
Not the question at hand. But since none of us are the various Secretaries of State, how do you know he didn't prove it? The burden isn't to prove to the internet.
The courts have thus far refused to hear the merits of the cases, but only on the basis of technicalities...
They have not allowed anyone for officially ask the question. That can hardly be defined as disagreeing with the merits of the question...
Oh, I think we’ve pretty much always gotten the government we deserve.
How do you know?
"And yet according to your idiotic logic that “Nobody has produced any proof that Obama is not legally qualified”,..."
Before you go calling anything "idiotic" you might want to bother to read what I was responding to. For the Chief Justice to knowingly swear in a fraud he would have to be convinced that he was fraud. That would require proof.
What does an oath mean to a man who is a supposed Constitutional scholar and doesn’t meet Constitutional requirements for the job he is taking.?
I understand it just fine thanks. Did you have a point to make?
under legal age....
and then he was adopted and registered as a legal citizen of Indonesia at a time when his American citizenship had to be renounced in order to do so...
He then traveled under his Indonesian passport through college and never naturalized as a US citizen after...???
That's what I have too. Same result.
You REALLY MUST do your homework. The BC has been alleged a fraudulent document. But even if it weren’t, Hawaii issued BC’s to people born outside of the US at that time...
No, they haven't. Yes I read. The trick is not believing everything you read. Especially when it is either in the New York Times, or just some guy on the internet.
"He has spent a million bucks to avoid delivering a $10.00 certified copy of his birth records."
Ah, another of things you read on the internet. Got any proof of this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.