Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Birth Certificate Issue wont Die until Obama produces.
The Liberal Democrat ^ | 1-12-2009 | Will

Posted on 01/12/2009 8:40:09 PM PST by Freefreq

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: TruthWillWin

President Bush is in a position to know, he has the power to get any kind of information and he has the ability to direct the Justice Department — and — he has a duty as President to uphold the Constitution...

That says it all for me...


41 posted on 01/14/2009 3:23:30 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: bvw

You said — “That’s an assumption, not a fact. What statement in re Obama’s eligibility, specifically in regard to “natural born” status, has President Bush made?”

It’s a fact that the President has directed no prosecution for violation of this Constitutional provision. Since he has the duty to uphold the Constitution, that’s all I need to know...


42 posted on 01/14/2009 3:25:05 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

You said — “I suppose ST is using his twist logic from post #27. “

Pretty sound logic in that the President must uphold the Constitution, per his sworn oath and the President has the ability to get the information and also had the reason to do so (with this passport issue) and has the ability to direct prosecution when it is needed.

No prosecution means exactly that the President has decided, according to his knowledge and his sworn oath of office that there is no violation to prosecute...


43 posted on 01/14/2009 3:27:13 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

That’s supposed to be your logic in determining that Bush has verified that Obama is eligible?


44 posted on 01/14/2009 3:31:22 PM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

You asked — “That’s supposed to be your logic in determining that Bush has verified that Obama is eligible?”

Yeah, I trust President Bush a lot more than Obama...

I actually believe that President Bush will do the right thing on the qualifications issue. If it’s a violation of the Constitution, he will order prosecution. If it’s not, he won’t.


45 posted on 01/14/2009 3:35:17 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

Did Vice President Cheney ask Obama to produce any evidence of his citizenship when the House and Senate met in joint session to certify the elctoral vote? Did any Congressman or Seantor object?


46 posted on 01/14/2009 3:35:38 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing
Whatever he is hiding is vitally important to his dreams and aspirations. If it wasn’t, he’d have settled this issue a long, long time ago.

Settled it how? If he had produced his COLB to a court, the plaintiffs would have demanded the original vault birth certificate. If he had produced that, they would have demanded that document examiners examine it. If the court found the certificate legitimate, the plaintiffs would have demanded evidence about his adoption in Indonesia, and on and on.

If Obama had, for one minute, conceded that any court had any role in this process, he would have been tied up in litigation for 8 years. As it is, the courts have dismissed every case; the Supreme Court has refused to hear any appeals; neither Hillary (in the primaries), McCain (in the general election), the Electoral College, or any member of the House or Senate (when the electoral votes were certified), has questioned his eleigibility. He will be sworn in on schedule by Chief Justice Roberts, and will continue to ignore the internet rumors.

47 posted on 01/14/2009 3:44:30 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
President Bush laid the duty to interpret the Constitution at the feet of the Supreme Court in Campaign Finance Reform. Old school Presidents would have never have signed onto it. President Bush signed over everyman's and woman's wallet -- in total totality -- to the Treasury and the Fed.

We are each and all beggars hoping (if we are wise, idiotically ignorant of the theft if not) that their inaccountabilities will not print so many dollars that ours are worthless except as fuel for a poor man's fire. That is beyond any penumbra of Constitutional authority, and by the grant to being non-reviewable it is beyond any vesitge of the duty of a steward in care of the wealth of others by long established common law.

Yet in this one matter you expect Mr. Bush, Commander in Chief, finally relented of his negligence in all non-war areas with regard to insuring that the Constituional requirements were met?

Where then, assuming like a rose-colored-glasses wearing daughter of Doctor Pangloss that he did do that duty, where then did he get the proper definition of "natural born" from?

For as far as we all can find, there has never been a settled determination of that term.

48 posted on 01/14/2009 4:02:47 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Let’s see if Alan Keyes can clarify this issue for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0sQroiCYNc


49 posted on 01/14/2009 4:08:08 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american
"The law is the law."

If only it were that simple. With all due respect....we wouldn't have witnessed Republicans prosecuted for non-crimes while DemocRats skate after committing crimes that they were guilty of beyond any shadow of doubt, all the while getting a free-pass from the leftist media.

The law may be the law, but there are ""special people"" that don't have to follow the same laws that you, I and fellow conservatives and Republicans have to follow. Those special people are, as you should know, called leftist DemocRats.

50 posted on 01/14/2009 4:16:01 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: XenaLee

I completely agree with you! If Obama takes the oath knowing that he is ineligible to be President because he was born in Kenya (or is not a natural born citizen some other way), it would be called a “perjured oath.” Note the amount of legal fees Obama has paid to keep his original birth certificate hidden. That tells you something right there...... Note Obama’s past recreational drug use! If he were a Republican candidate, the media would be in an uncontrollable frenzy! But with Obama, the issue is essentially ignored.


51 posted on 01/14/2009 4:35:13 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

I’d like to think (or hope) that something will come (eventually) of this eligibility issue. But I am coming to the gloomy conclusion that the fate we are about to suffer at the hands of the Godless left is one that we cannot escape. Part of me wants to fight it with all my being...but the other part of me is starting to feel a bit resigned to the reality (sigh).


52 posted on 01/14/2009 5:12:57 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
If Obama had, for one minute, conceded that any court had any role in this process, he would have been tied up in litigation for 8 years.

Excellent point. I realized that this birther stuff was tinfoil hat nonsense, but the one unresolved question in my mind was why Obama's lawyers, rather than simply providing a copy of the COLB to the court, went to the trouble of writing that brief arguing that Berg had no standing. You have answered it to my satisfaction. Thanks for clearing that up.

53 posted on 01/15/2009 5:38:37 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Freefreq

Anybody have a link to the thread about bc on the Hannity board? Couldn’t find it.


54 posted on 02/02/2009 6:29:22 AM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson