Posted on 02/24/2009 5:05:33 PM PST by slomark
The Obama administration may have said it wouldnt attempt to revive the Fairness Doctrine, but thats not enough for Republican Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina. He wants to force Senate Democrats to put up or shut up.
In order to prevent the FCC from reinstating the Fairness Doctrine, DeMint will propose the Broadcaster Freedom Act as an amendment to the D.C. Voting Rights bill.
Im glad President Obama finally confirmed his opposition to the Fairness Doctrine, which attacks the right of free speech on talk radio, DeMint said, but many Democrats in Congress are still pushing it now is the time for Congress to take a stand against this kind of censorship. I intend to seek a vote on this amendment next week so every senator is on record: Do you support free speech or do you want to silence voices you disagree with?
Wed guess DeMint is surely hoping the vote will take place before Al Franken can be seated in the Senate. Theres no shutting that guy up.
Go get ‘em Senator. Make them vote on this POS.
DeMint is starting to look and sound like a leader. We sure need one.
DeMint needs to add a provision that restricts the interpretation of the localism clause.
Whereas, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution clearly states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances";
Whereas, members of Congress are recently on record saying they want to re-impose the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" on U.S. broadcasters, or else accomplish the same goal of censoring talk radio by other means, and thereby establish government and quasi-government watchdogs as the arbiters of "fairness" rather than the free and open marketplace of ideas;
Whereas, the U.S. experimented with the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" for 38 years - from 1949 through 1987 - during which time it was repeatedly used by presidents and other political leaders to muzzle dissent and criticism;
Whereas, the abandonment of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" in 1987, thanks to President Ronald Reagan, resulted in an unprecedented explosion of new and diverse voices and political speech - starting with Rush Limbaugh - that revitalized the AM radio band and provided Americans with a multitude of alternative viewpoints;
Whereas, talk radio is one of the most crucial components of the free press in America, and is single-handedly responsible for informing tens of millions of Americans about what their government leaders are doing;
Whereas, it is a wholly un-American idea that government should be the watchdog of the press and a policeman of speech, as opposed to the uniquely American ideal of a free people and a free press being the vigilant watchdogs of government;
Whereas, the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" - either under that name, or using a new name and even more devious methods - represents a frontal assault on the First Amendment, and its re-imposition would constitute nothing more nor less than the crippling of America's robust, unfettered, free press:
SIGN THE PETITION at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=87882
The fact that Franken has done some pretty controversial “comedy” in his life makes this pretty ironic.
Am keeping an eye on DeMint. He’s an up and comer.
With star power that could easily eclipse Obama when the time is right.
Anybody else agree?
Yes. We will see. Hope he doesn’t buckle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.