Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel
"Ummmmmm is that it. That's a small nitpick. SCOTUS fall under the protection from the United States Marshals Service, Judicial Security Division (JSD) and is easily to confuse them with the Secret Service.

So, to be clear, you are taking at face value this woman's statement that she "gave a suitcase" of information to CJ Roberts about a pending case and Roberts responding "just give it to my Secret Service Agent and I promise I'll read it all."?

There is a very clear definition of ex parte communication that all judges, including the Supremes strictly adhere to. You don't think that this violates those guidelines?

Let's give her the benefit of the doubt (that's a big benefit) that this did indeed happen the way she described. Is it not equally reasonable to presume that Roberts felt this woman could have been some kind of threat and diverted her attention to his security detail? I would guess that's a much more likely scenario if she had any interaction with Roberts at all. But, to think, even for an instance, that Roberts would listen to her and make any kind of promise with respect to a pending case before the court IS CRAZY.

This kind of rabidly unintellectual and dare I say, crazy talk is what has allowed the MSM to paint conservatives with a broad brush of lunacy, unreasoned and illogical thinking the last several years.

65 posted on 03/14/2009 3:23:40 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Big_Monkey
Was Orly in front of a large crowd? Have you known her to lie? Did she have a recent case in front of the Supreme Court?

There is a very clear definition of ex parte communication that all judges, including the Supremes strictly adhere to. You don't think that this violates those guidelines? to

Obama recently visited all of the Supreme Court Justices except Alito while active Obama citizenship cases were on the docket. That's an Ex Parte violation.

Let's give her the benefit of the doubt (that's a big benefit) that this did indeed happen the way she described.

I give her the benefit more than a guy named Obama who has repeatedly lied. So what do we call an excessive liar?

that this did indeed happen the way she described. Is it not equally reasonable to presume that Roberts felt this woman could have been some kind of threat and diverted her attention to his security detail?

I sincerely doubt it. Oh please, you're reaching with fantasy.

66 posted on 03/14/2009 3:59:41 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey
This kind of rabidly unintellectual and dare I say, crazy talk is what has allowed the MSM to paint conservatives with a broad brush of lunacy, unreasoned and illogical thinking the last several years.

Intellectual dishonesty and lunacy is when a president will not let anyone have 10 dollar copy of his Certification Of Live Birth that has a very minimum of information on it. He should have sent out hundreds of copies to every news organization straight from the Hawaiian Department of Health - not show that stupid image of it online from a leftist site.

That's intellectual dishonesty and behavior of a criminal who wants to hide the truth.

Intellectual dishonesty is the Main Stream Presss when they repeatedly lie that the State of Hawaii has verified the Obama COLB he has placed on the Web as a genuine document.

That's intellectual dishonesty.

Say hello to Michael Michael for us.

67 posted on 03/14/2009 4:10:07 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson