Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Big_Monkey
Was Orly in front of a large crowd? Have you known her to lie? Did she have a recent case in front of the Supreme Court?

There is a very clear definition of ex parte communication that all judges, including the Supremes strictly adhere to. You don't think that this violates those guidelines? to

Obama recently visited all of the Supreme Court Justices except Alito while active Obama citizenship cases were on the docket. That's an Ex Parte violation.

Let's give her the benefit of the doubt (that's a big benefit) that this did indeed happen the way she described.

I give her the benefit more than a guy named Obama who has repeatedly lied. So what do we call an excessive liar?

that this did indeed happen the way she described. Is it not equally reasonable to presume that Roberts felt this woman could have been some kind of threat and diverted her attention to his security detail?

I sincerely doubt it. Oh please, you're reaching with fantasy.

66 posted on 03/14/2009 3:59:41 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel
"Obama recently visited all of the Supreme Court Justices except Alito while active Obama citizenship cases were on the docket. That's an Ex Parte violation.

No that's not a violation of anything. Did Obama discuss the case with any of the Justices? - no. It's a far cry from having a discussion with the plaintiff's attorney about the case while removed from the defendant's attorney. That is Ex Parte communication.

70 posted on 03/14/2009 4:40:09 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson