Posted on 04/03/2009 8:47:49 AM PDT by Michael Eden
“Neither do Islamistsic fundamentalists. You are correct, though.”
That’s ridiculous. Islamic extremists kill homosexuals...we just rebuke them and watch them parade around in SFS is silly get-ups.
- - - - - - - - - -
Islamists have “useful idiots” just as Hitler and Stalin had them.
Liberals are the useful idiots of Islamic extremism. Do the Islamists despise American liberals even more than they do American conservatives? Of course they do! You can’t imagine how much they hate Hollywood culture, and the loose morality, and feminism, etc. etc.
Yet they don’t mind the fact that liberals are hard at work undermining Western culture’s attempts to deal with terrorism and Islamic extremism. They don’t mind the fact that liberals are deciding that Western culture should “tolerate” shariah law.
It is insane that liberals and homosexuals would essentially support - by weakness and appeasement and “tolerance” - the Islamist agenda. But that is precisely what they are doing.
Oh...so sorry, I thought you struck out Islam there entirely...my bad. Good you aren’t Rosie O’Donald. :)~
True.
My understanding of the Nazi homosexual dealings is that the more masculine homosexuals were left alone, but men who were more effeminate were removed from society.
Nice article, very informative.
Who will American fascism be intolerant of?
Those that have been said to “cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
>>thanks to president zero
american businesses will be regulated from
brussels.<<
Won’t happen - all owners will be out of business. Private islands keep looking better and better, every day.
Fascism, Communism, and Socialism all put the state above the individual. All did away with dissenters and undesirables. Read Goldberg's book, it will explain why they are linked. It also very nicely summarizes why the war happened between these more alike than different ideologies.
Hitler had no problem using homosexuals to achieve his goals.
My understanding of the Nazi homosexual dealings is that the more masculine homosexuals were left alone, but men who were more effeminate were removed from society.
- - - - - - - -
There was a great deal of “This is okay until we decide it isn’t okay anymore” with Hitler and the NAZIs.
For instance, they embraced avant garde art and the whole artsy-fartsy thing. Until they secured power. And then they went after anything that violated Hitler’s “aesthetics.”
And the NAZIs primary vehicle to power was angry labor unions. How do you think Hitler treated malcontent workers once HE became “the man”?
There were a lot of VERY suprised artists, homosexuals, and others who suddenly found themselves on the outs.
The History Channel program that documented the homosexuality of the SA pointed out that there was evidence linking Hitler himself to homosexuality. And that one of the reasons he purged the SA was to destroy the evidence/witnesses.
Ultimately, a lot of what was “in” and what was “out” depended on der Fuhrer’s mood.
If you are referring to the Russians opposing the NAZI’s I see your point. I would point out though that a Cowboys fan and a Steelers fan both like football, just a different way of getting there.
No comment: I just thought that was so damn funny I'd insert it again!
Yes. For that reason alone, I scoffed at my Political Science professor when he said his ideal form of government was a Benevolent Philosopher King with a willing army to back him.
Great, if your philosopher King is God, not so good when he is a human being. I told him I prefered the rule of law and the rights of the individual over the rule of any man.
While he may have been a flaming lefty, he certainly didn't take arguing with his philosophy personal. I got an A in his class.
If Political Science were taught as follows....
Nationalist Socialists are Nazis.
Internationalist Socialists are Communists.
American Socialists are Democrats....
It would easily be understood by all and no further clarifications would be necessary.
Not to belie the Authors underlying point too badly, but this quote:
First of all, socialism, communism and fascism are kissing cousins, intimately related to one another.
Is painful to read as a history scholar and not even remotely accurate as 31 Million Dead on the WWII European Eastern Front will attest.
Lets keep our argument to the facts please, theyre on our side. Now is not the time for our side to be producing sound-bytes which can be used to incorrectly paint the entire Conservative Movement as Ignorant of History. This quote certainly could qualify.
- - - - - - - - -
You couldn’t be more wrong.
Both fascism and communism were forms of socialism. That is simply a fact - and I documented that merely by defining the acronyms “USSR” and “NAZI.”
Fascism was a national-based form of socialism, and communsim was a class-based form of socialism. Much of the outworkings of both systems were identical to one another.
Jonah Goldberg’s book - as just one among many - show just how many similarities there were between the two forms of socialism, and how many liberals were sympathetic to both as a result.
The fact that Hitler turned on Stalin had FAR more to do with his view of Aryan domination (and the fact that he was insane) than it had to do with ideology.
And you should also ask yourself - given that you seem to think that the fact that they fought means they were entirely unrelated systems - why it is that when someone is murdered, the first people the police look at are the victim’s very own family members?
I stand by what I said.
In the beginning they did. However, Christianity was perverted by the Nazis (as it is today my many). The priests were basically told to toe the Nazi line or they'd be dealt with. Slowly the church was forced to turn from God to State (and even Hitler himself) as the object of worship.
it is happening.
it is the agreement made by obama in london.
re: fox news yesterday evening.
NAZI is not an acronym.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.