Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama may be a natural born citizen after all

Posted on 07/23/2009 8:07:18 PM PDT by DavidFarrar

I have spent time trying to make sense of the recent debate over Obama's Constitutional qualifications to be President of the United States and have recently come to the conclusion that Obama would be a "natural born" U.S. citizen if his father was Obama Sr., a British subject and Kenyan national at the time of his birth.


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: certifigate; naturalborn; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281 next last
Notwithstanding Obama's actual place of birth, which remains open until corroborative evidence is obtained, if Obama was, indeed, born in Hawaii, even though his admitted father was a British subject at the time of his birth, and even if a valid marriage certificate does exist, it would not have been recognized as legally binding in Hawaii at the time of his birth. In effect, Obama was born out of wedlock. If this proves to be the case, Obama would be a natural born U.S. Citizen, having been "natural born" by a U.S. Citizen in Hawaii.

As I say, until Obama can demonstrate he was actually born in Hawaii, the case continues. But as far as being a natural born U.S. citizen, if he was born in Hawaii, he would be a natural born U.S. Citizen.

If anybody has any contrary points to be made along these lines, I would be glad to elaborate my thinking on the subject.

I will say, I do believe the correct definition of a "natural born" U.S. citizen is of being born of two U.S. citizens -- without question. But when only one parent is legally recognized, and that parent is a U.S. citizen, and the child is born in the U.S., the child is a "natural born" U.S. citizen.

ex animo davidfarrar

1 posted on 07/23/2009 8:07:18 PM PDT by DavidFarrar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

2 posted on 07/23/2009 8:09:46 PM PDT by Crazieman (Feb 7, 2008 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1966675/posts?page=28#28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar
I will say, I do believe the correct definition of a "natural born" U.S. citizen is of being born of two U.S. citizens -- without question. But when only one parent is legally recognized, and that parent is a U.S. citizen, and the child is born in the U.S., the child is a "natural born" U.S. citizen.

But when only one parent is legally recognized

This contradicts your premise so I don't know how you are proceeding with the argument.

3 posted on 07/23/2009 8:11:37 PM PDT by frogjerk (It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible - George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

bttt


4 posted on 07/23/2009 8:12:22 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

NEWSPAPER “evidence” proves NOTHING, alas. The Mighty Media Monolith will print whatever they are PAID to print.


5 posted on 07/23/2009 8:12:53 PM PDT by 2harddrive (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

TWO POINTS!!!!!


6 posted on 07/23/2009 8:13:28 PM PDT by NorwegianViking (Organizing for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

Do you believe that a child born of one US citizen parent is an American citizen?


7 posted on 07/23/2009 8:13:38 PM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Hasn’t it been proven that the Obamas never lived at the address cited in the birth announcment?


8 posted on 07/23/2009 8:14:20 PM PDT by frogjerk (It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible - George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

Your supposition is based on the theory that the marraige between Obama’s parents would not have been legally binding in Hawaii at the time.

What is this theory based on?

If the marriage was not legally binding, why is there a divorce decree?


9 posted on 07/23/2009 8:14:32 PM PDT by LegalAlien1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

Why would not his father have been legally recognized? So what if they are not married. The citizenship of the father is known, he was still alive and present. It’s not like they have NO record ofthe father and therefore would only have the mothers’ citizenship to go by determining if he was natural born or not. I could see it might come into play if the father was unknown and/or not there. But this is not the case.

He is listed as the father on the birth certificate. Since when would the marital status change anything, he is his father whether they were married or not. Men are fathers if they have kids, just like women are mothers if they have kids. They may not be ‘husbands’ or ‘wives’, but they are fathers and mothers.


10 posted on 07/23/2009 8:14:37 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

I don’t want to see a newspaper announcement or an online COLB. Just show us the birth certificate. How hard is that? Seriously.


11 posted on 07/23/2009 8:14:49 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar; Crazieman

Look, if he was born in the U.S, I think he was a citizen. My mother was not a citizen when I was born (although my father was not only a citizen of almost 30, but he was also a combat veteran U.S. Army officer), and I am a citizen.

I don’t know that a birth announcement in a newspaper proves anything if the parents could register the birth even if the birth didn’t take place in the U.S. (my understanding of Hawaii policy then). All the announcements I have seen in newspapers (for my son and for me- they had stopped them by the time my daughters were born) were from the hospital.


12 posted on 07/23/2009 8:16:01 PM PDT by conservative cat (America, you have been PWNED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

Who delivered Barak? Do we know or does anyone claim to be the doctor/nurse on call when he was supposedly born in some hospital in Hawaii? I would have to think that someone would remember delivering a child with the name Barak as it is not ordinary.


13 posted on 07/23/2009 8:16:29 PM PDT by frogjerk (It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible - George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Somebody claimed to have researched that address at the time of Zer0’s birth. 0be’s Commie Mommie and Daddy didn’t live there and maybe not together anywhere else.


14 posted on 07/23/2009 8:17:00 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
Yes, that would certainly be considered on its face, good, strong corroborative evidence. But on closer inspection, it may simply be an automatic repetition of a lie, being automatically printed by the newspapers from Hawaiian Health official records.

In order to ascertain the true probative value of these newspaper clippings (two), other evidence needs to be obtained as to their source.

ex animo

davidfarrar

15 posted on 07/23/2009 8:17:07 PM PDT by DavidFarrar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

This is what I found in 10 seconds of googling (not vouching for its authenticity): http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/IssueBirthAnnouncement.htm


16 posted on 07/23/2009 8:17:55 PM PDT by piytar (Take back the language: Obama axing Chrystler dealers based on political donations is REAL fascism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar
Anyone born in the US, with very few exceptions, e.g. those born to foreign diplomats, is a natural born US citizen.

It makes no difference if the parents were US citizens or if they were married.

17 posted on 07/23/2009 8:18:06 PM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar
Here is what he is hiding:

Hawaii Birth

NOW WHICH OF THESE BLOCKS IS BARACK AFRAID TO SHOW THE CITIZENS OF THE USA??

1a. Child’s First Name
1b. Middle Name
1c. Last Name
2. Sex
3. This Birth – Single, Twin, Triplet
4. If Twin or Triplet Was Child Born – First, Second, Third
5a. Birth Date – Month, Day, Year
5b. Hour
6a. Place of Birth: City, Town or Rural Location
6b. Island
7a. Usual Residence of Mother: City, Town or Rural Location
7b. Island
7c. County and State or Foreign Country
7d. Street Address
7e. Is Residence inside City or Town Limits – If No, Give Judicial District – Yes, No
7f. Mother’s Mailing Address
7g. Is Residence on a Farm or Plantation – Yes, No
8. Full Name of Father
9. Race of Father
10. Age of Father
11. Birthplace – (Island, State or Foreign Country)
12a. Usual Occupation
12b. Kind of Business or Industry
13. Full Maiden Name of Mother
14. Race of Mother
15. Age of Mother
16. Birthplace – (Island, State or Foreign Country)
17a. Type of Occupation Outside Home During Pregnancy
17b. Date Last Worked
18a. Signature of Parent or Other Informant – Parent, Other
18b. Date of Signature
19a. Signature of Attendant – M.D., D.O., Midwife, Other
19b. Date of Signature
20. Date Accepted
21. Signature of Local Registrar
22. Date Accepted by Reg. General

One or more of these blocks having damning information to Barack. There is no other reason for him to refuse to release this document.

18 posted on 07/23/2009 8:18:41 PM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar
There still remains the issue of his (possible/probable) adoption by the Indonesian, Lolo Soetoro.

This would have given him at the least a dual citizenship.
Would it not?

19 posted on 07/23/2009 8:18:52 PM PDT by Semper Mark (Trickle up Third World poverty will lead to cascading Third World tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
"NEWSPAPER “evidence” proves NOTHING, alas. The Mighty Media Monolith will print whatever they are PAID to print."

LOL... Yeah! No S^!*... My picture is on the cover of Rolling Stones Magazine. $15 and you can get yours on it too. At least that's what it cost me a few years back at that State Fair. hahahahaha....

20 posted on 07/23/2009 8:19:04 PM PDT by The Anti-One (So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson