Posted on 08/03/2009 6:14:28 PM PDT by Danae
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder; his Staff; and the United States Department of Justice to which he Over-Sees
Violated the Code of Federal Regulations as well as Federal Criminal Laws Pertaining to their Conflict-of-Interest
Berg’s Qui Tam Case [False Claims Act] against
Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama
and Berg has filed a Motion for Reconsideration
(Washington, DC – 07/02/2009) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending in Federal Court, Berg vs. Obama [Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340]; this case - Berg as Relator v. Obama; [U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia No. 08-cv-01933]; and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al [U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080]; announced today that he filed a Motion for Reconsideration in the Qui Tam [False Claims Act] Case filed in the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia as United States Attorney General Eric Holder and his Office have a Conflict-of-Interest and inasmuch violated both the Federal Regulations as well as Federal Criminal Codes. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, his Office, his Staff and the United States Department of Justice are required to uphold and ensure our laws; the laws of the United States are upheld and enforced.
Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution states:
“The Constitution entrusts the Executive with duty to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."
“The request of the Government to Dismiss his Qui Tam action against Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama is in clear violation of the U.S. Attorney General’s duties pursuant to Article II, Section 3 and should ‘NOT’ be allowed”.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamacrimes.com ...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
For Immediate Release: - 06/09/2009
Berg states Orly Taitz has gone too far; Berg sues Taitz for violating individuals basic rights – Privacy by revealing birth dates and Social Security numbers Berg states Taitz should be disbarred – her actions have been detrimental to the positive efforts of so many to out Obama as he is Constitutionally ineligible to be President as he is not natural born Berg Filed DEFAULT against Taitz and on 6/08/09 filed OPPOSITION to Taitz’s Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment also sued is Sankey Investigations for the same reasons and others for defamation and libel obamacrimes.com is the web site for the truth about Obama
View Documents
PROPOSED ORDER
Plaintiff's Opposition To set Aside Default
Certificate of service
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
(Lafayette Hill, PA – 06/09/2009) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that he had filed a lawsuit against Orly Taitz for her unprofessional and unlawful tactics by disseminating birth dates and Social Security Numbers and other vicious lies to harm innocent people.
Berg said, “Orly Taitz, Esquire must be disbarred ! Orly has been grabbing the headlines, but doing disservice to the millions who want Obama to prove he is constitutionally eligible/qualified to be President of the United States.
Presently Orly has only one [1] case pending and in my opinion, not very strong and definitely not on point. On the other hand, I [Berg] have three [3] lawsuits pending, all in Federal Court, two [2] in the Appellate Courts [Third Circuit – argument was scheduled end of May 2009, but now the earliest it will be heard is September or October of 2009 on the issue of ‘standing’; the other in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Hollister case)]. The 3rd case is ‘under seal.’”
Berg continued, “Orly has gone too far by e-mailing the Social Security number of my assistant, Lisa. By doing so, with the help of Neil Sankey, Sankey Investigating, Inc. and the Sankey Firm, Orly has violated State [California] and Federal laws and has admitted to the mass e-mailing distribution to tens of thousands of individuals. After suit was filed against Orly and other Defendants, Orly’s Answer was due May 26, 2009, however, it was not filed. I requested Default to be entered against Orly and other Defendants for their failure to Answer the Complaint. The Court entered the Default on May 27, 2009.”
Berg stated, “On or about May 28, 2009, Orly faxed a one [1] page Motion to Set Aside the Default entered on May 27, 2009 against her and Defend our Freedoms Foundation, Inc. I, Berg, filed our Response in Opposition to Orly’s Request to Set Aside the Default on June 8th and can be found on my website at obamacrimes.com.
Neil Sankey appeared on Plains Radio Network on May 28, 2009 with a made up story that Lisa Ostella sent him emails and asked him to investigate my assistant, Lisa and me. This was a completely fabricated story. Neil Sankey and Orly conspired and not only altered emails sent from Lisa Ostella, they created emails using Lisa Ostella’s email address, which Lisa Ostella did not have any knowledge of, never gave any permission for anyone to use her email address, never gave authorization to draft emails on her behalf, she never drafted the emails nor did she send them. In so doing, Neil Sankey and Orly altered and forged documents (emails) of Lisa Ostella. On May 31, 2009, Orly posted the altered and forged emails on her website with a statement that Lisa Ostella sent them to Neil Sankey, knowing the information to be completely false.”
Berg continued, “We are fighting to uphold our Constitution and the laws of our Nation. Neil Sankey and Orly are not helping our cause by degrading those working so hard to learn the truth and breaking the very laws we are desperately trying to uphold.”
Berg said, “Our focus should be on whether our President, Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama is constitutionally eligible/qualified to serve as the United States President, as it appears he is not a “natural born” United States citizen and eligible pursuant to the United States Constitution.”
Berg requested, “All those that want to prove that Obama is constitutionally qualified, please send letters and emails to the White House requesting that the President of the United States show his credentials proving he is in fact a ‘natural born’ United States citizen and eligible to serve as our President.”
Berg continued, “The Obama candidacy is the biggest ‘HOAX’ perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years, since our nation was established. Obama must be legally removed from office.
I believe that 15 to 20 million people are aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' and we must make 75 to 100 million people aware. When people are made aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' that Obama has not proven he is constitutionally 'qualified/eligible' to be President; that Obama has not produced his original (vault version) 'Birth Certificate;' that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his 'adopted' name of 'Barry Soetoro' from Indonesia; they will demand Obama be removed from the Office of President of the United States."
Berg concluded, "I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in 'our' U.S.A., for 'our' forefathers and for the 1.5 million men and women that have died defending our Constitution in the many wars over the years and the 1.5 million men and women who were injured in those wars, with our legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President."
* * * * * * *
The following is an update on my three [3] pending cases regarding my challenge to Obama's lack of qualifications/eligibility to be President.
Also, I am preparing to file a 4th case - Quo Warranto [challenge person in office - that does not meet the qualifications].
As you know, I was the first to legally raise the issue - having filed my lawsuit on August 21, 2008, before the DNC Convention.
Status of Cases:
Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340
Briefs have been filed by all parties.
This is case that was dismissed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA
Judge Surrick dismissed for lack of "standing" by Philip J. Berg
This is case that I bypassed Third Circuit to U.S. Supreme Court - where U.S. Supreme Court denied several Injunctions and to hear case.
However, case is still alive in the Third Circuit.
Oral argument is tentatively scheduled for September/October 2009.
Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed.
Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080 U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254 This is the case of retired Air Force Colonel Hollister who is on lifetime Presidential recall. Hollister needs to know if recalled by Soetoro/Obama - must he obey an Order by legal President or disobey the illegal Order by a Constitutionally ineligible/unqualified "Usurper" President. Case was dismissed and Sanction of “Reprimand” imposed on our local attorney. Appeal has been filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. We are waiting for the briefing schedule so we can file our opening briefs.
For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
In a nut shell, Holder worked in the Campaign for Obama. Holder is in charge of Filing cases against criminals. Berg provided tons of evidence of a crime, but Holder refuses to prosecute his boss, wonder why?
100% a conflict of Interest.
We have an AG who lets people get away with intimidating voters, why would he turn on his boss? Remember all the fun the libs made of Ascroft, but this guy walks on water.
This should be big news!
The US Attorney General is deliberately NOT prosecuting a crime.
Only if it was a republican.
Roger that.
Barry has done more to damage race relations than Senator Byrd ever did.
You see at a negro, you know there's a 95% chance they voted for Barry - and only because of his color.
Expect Integrity from any Obama “appointee” and you’ll always be disappointed
Yea, and right now those “appointees” are Deliberately breaking the law by not investigating crimes! That is a CRIME in and of itself! Holder ought to be sharing a cell with Barry!
Well, if this is the examply I can hardly see why we would WANT to.
That being said, there are a ton of great Black Politicians. Alan Keyes, comes to mind right off the top. And its damn too bad that all Obama is doing is just redefining corruption larger and far more grotesquely than ANYONE ever imagined.
Except conservatives of course, who clearly knew hwat he meant by “Fundamentally changing America”. Yea, well NO THANKS BAMBI! Get thee in jail.
This is nothing new for Holder. When he was #2 at “Justice” he refused to prosecute Cheryl Mills for perjury even though the record was clear that she lied under oath to the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.
Berg can go pound sand!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.