Posted on 08/03/2009 8:21:03 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2307402/posts?page=1139#1139
================================
You're a forgery. Case open.
You are unhinged and we know it for sure now...
The “Kenyan” document you linked to is STILL Form 47O44.
Is that the “pseudo” fake one that some hacker put on Orly’s site; as opposed to the “totally” fake South Australian one?
Mombasa was part of the state of Zanzibar until 12 December 1963 when it was ceded to be incorporated into the newly independent state of Kenya.
So now 0bama is a “natural born Zanzibaran”?
Troll alert. Clean up on aisle allmendream. Obamanoid slugslime in progress.
Uuummm, Common Dreams dot Org., the latest news is that the Bomford is the fake one fabricated by Koyann (Steve Ellis). See link below:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2307402/posts?page=1139#1139
Koyann
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:koyaan/index?brevity=full;tab=comments
Document 47O44 is a fake. That is my point. Apparently you agree with me on that.
Anybody linking to document 47O44 other than to heap scorn upon it has been taken in by an obvious fraud.
So stop linking to it.
If Obama isn't eligible, there will be a unanimous vote to impeach him. It wouldn't come to that because Obama would be compelled to resign.
The reason the Democrats would have to impeach is that Obama wouldn't have any authority if he remained in office and Congress likes having their bills signed into law and actually have citizens follow those laws.
Also, states would no longer recognize the Federal Government's authority and the military wouldn't recognize him as CinC. No army of ACORN people will be able to enforce his perpetually illegal presidency.
BTTT
If Obama isn’t eligible, there will be a unanimous vote to impeach him.If Obama isn’t eligible, there will be a unanimous vote to impeach him.
***You know that stuff that plops out of the back end of a bull? Yeah, that. If we couldn’t get the Bent One with DNA on a blue dress, we won’t get this guy with a little piece of disputed paper and a democratic majority congress.
Kevmo wrote: ***You know that stuff that plops out of the back end of a bull? Yeah, that. If we couldn’t get the Bent One with DNA on a blue dress, we won’t get this guy with a little piece of disputed paper and a democratic majority congress.
This is almost as good as the DUmmie who yelled that Obama must be eligible becaue THE LAW wouldn't let him be President otherwise.
Maybe someone else remembers this like I do... Back during the election debacle I remember SCOTUS being very concerned with the "remedy". If we decide in your favor, how would it all play out?
The only real remedy if Obama is rendered ineligible to hold office is to remove him from office. While I think that would be the moral, Constitutional way to proceed, it really does place our country in an explosive situation.
Think how incensed people were over Bush vs Gore. Can you imagine "The Republicans removed the First Black President from office"? I just don't think SCOTUS will go there.
I didn't say he'd be impeached for having a little piece of disputed paper. He'd be impeached if he was proved to be ineligible. I hope you can see the difference between dispute and proof.
You signed up yesterday just to post that?
TROLL!!!
All Obama has to do is produce his birth certificate.
Two years ago his law firm was working on this problem. Why?
Why did he spend over $1million NOT to show it instead of $12.50 it would cost to show it?
If he manages his affairs so badly, how can he manage the country?
He promised transparency. Why are ALL of his records hidden?
Why hasn't there been an investigation into the over $300,000 per year bribe that the Obamas got via a phoney job for Michelle Obama that reeks of corruption in high places?
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
I can see the difference. He will not be impeached because of one huge problem: our congress critters, especially democrats, have no respect for the constitution.
I just don’t think SCOTUS will go there.
***SCOTUS didn’t go there. They had Berg v Obama right in front of them and they looked the other way. It was their job to uphold the constitution and they did not do it. We give them lifetime employment so that they don’t have to worry about the political ramifications of their decision, and the reason why they wouldn’t make a decision was... due to the political ramifications. They violated the social contract. If any negative consequences arise due to this scandal, the responsibility falls on their shoulders.
He kinda has a good point. Here’s hoping the puppies let go of this bone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.