Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human Rights Watch Supports The Terrorist Agenda
Ma'ariv/The Lid ^ | 8/17/09 | The Lid

Posted on 08/16/2009 11:38:48 AM PDT by Shellybenoit

The International NGO, Human Rights Watch (HRW) is once again proving once again why its top banana Ken Roth is a perennial nominee for the Self Hating Jew Awards. They have a simple strategy, Skew the Story and Advocate Terrorism,

HRW is famous for inventing and/or twisting facts to slander Israel. They tend to only rely on Palestinian sources and never bother to verify.

HRW refuses to recognize terrorist attacks against Israel as provocative. For example, in Jan 2008, Joe Stork of HRW wrote a 34 paragraph long letter bashing Israel (the length of one of my wife's weekend Honey-do lists). Only two sentences of that tome mentioned the Hamas rocket attacks. In the Stork's toxic tome HRW claims that Gaza remains “occupied." At first I thought Mr. Stork hadn't read a newspaper in a few years, because Israel pulled out of Gaza three years earlier. But his omission was totally on purpose.

The Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv did some research on Joe Stork and published an expose' which proved that Stork is is a fanatical supporter of the elimination of Israel. He was a friend of Saddam, ruled out negotiations and supported the Munich Massacre, which “provided an important boost in morale among Palestinians.” Written in Hebrew, a translation of the article is below:

(Excerpt) Read more at yidwithlid.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Politics; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: bias; hamas; humanrightswatch; israel; terrorism

1 posted on 08/16/2009 11:38:48 AM PDT by Shellybenoit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

This is amazing. Joe Stork is an open advocate of terrorism. His position with HRW is the smoking gun of its true nature and intentions. That they fully expect to get away with this is a measure of their arrogance, and of the absolute depravity of the mainstream media, which continues to treat HRW as a credible and ethical source.


2 posted on 08/16/2009 12:18:15 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Victory in Iraq: Worst defeat for activist media since Goebbels shot himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellybenoit

Is anyone really surprised by this?


3 posted on 08/16/2009 12:34:55 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

I’m surprised they would this open about it. They really do have absolute confidence in the complicity of the mainstream media. We’ve known for many years about the real pro-terrorism agenda of the NGOs. Many others do not or the media would not be able to use them to advance their own pro-terror and anti-Israel agenda.


4 posted on 08/16/2009 12:50:31 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Victory in Iraq: Worst defeat for activist media since Goebbels shot himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

media-industrial complex ping.

I regard the NGOs like HRW as auxiliaries of the media-industrial complex, with a completely inter-dependent method of operation and a great degree of overlap in personnel, ideology, and even funding.


5 posted on 08/16/2009 12:57:15 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Victory in Iraq: Worst defeat for activist media since Goebbels shot himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

they dont care what we think....


6 posted on 08/16/2009 1:42:15 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

“they dont care what we think....”

Neither did Dan Blather when he tried to throw the election with some fake docs.


7 posted on 08/16/2009 1:49:55 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Victory in Iraq: Worst defeat for activist media since Goebbels shot himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

Yep.


8 posted on 08/16/2009 2:41:36 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson