Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitution: trashed by Obama, abandoned by SCOTUS

Posted on 08/19/2009 7:53:59 AM PDT by charlie72

Where there are no checks and balances, the way is open for dictatorship. Obama owns the Executive and Legislative Branches. Has he bought the Judicial Branch, too, or are they asleep? SCOTUS needs a lesson from Honduras. When their president wanted another term in violation of their constitution, their SC warned him to desist. When he printed ballots for a referendum on it, the SC ordered the military to arrest and exile him. The leftists: Obama, Chavez, Clinton, Castro and the OAS went nuts, calling it an illegal coup when it was actually a restoration of the rule of law. SCOTUS looked the other way when Obama refused to hand over eligibility documents to Justice Souter. Did he resign to keep from being suicided? When Obama stole the Census, the SCOTUS slept. Ditto nationalizing industries, gave preference to unions and broke contracts, dropped criminal charges for election violations against Black Panthers,etc. etc. He still has 3 and a half years to grant amnesty to illegals, make reparation payments for slavery, and ratify the ICC which allows UN troops to disarm citizens. Does the silence of SCOTUS imply consent? Will he declare martial law before/during the 2010 elections keep power? Many thought Nixon would use the military to preserve his power. Does anyone doubt that Marxist Obama would do that? Sleep on you old folks in black robes, and abandon your reason for existence while your country crumbles around you.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: constitution; obama; revolution; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2009 7:53:59 AM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: charlie72

Why isn’t this labeled as a vanity so that I don’t waste my time with such drivels?


2 posted on 08/19/2009 7:56:14 AM PDT by Twofortea (Yes, I often differ from "accepted" Conservative views. So sue me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charlie72
SCOTUS looked the other way when Obama refused to hand over eligibility documents to Justice Souter.

And when did Souter do this?

3 posted on 08/19/2009 7:58:40 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charlie72

Interesting “drivel”. And thank you for reminding everyone again that Obama=Chavez=Ortega=Castro. People do need to hear this again and again.


4 posted on 08/19/2009 8:01:52 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charlie72

And there are 40 plus ‘czars” who are making policy, totally unelected, unaccountable, uncomfirmed. some are avowed COMMIES and all are left wing radicals and Marxists who have no clue about free enterprise and capitalism.

These “czars” are making cabinet level recommendations and directing policy, but have NO authority or credibility.
My belief is these expanded, paid government positions are unConstitutional and definitely dangerous to our Republic.


5 posted on 08/19/2009 8:02:29 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (Obama is the ultimate LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charlie72

im not saying it didnt happen, but i have never heard of a refusal to submit to an order from Souter. Do you have any details on that part?


6 posted on 08/19/2009 8:03:15 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charlie72
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."

Thomas Jefferson

7 posted on 08/19/2009 8:16:18 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charlie72
It worked in Russia for Putin ...

to be all powerful and change laws about the Presidency ...

Unfortunately.

8 posted on 08/19/2009 8:19:00 AM PDT by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charlie72

Keelo v. New England
Refusal to stop the Executive’s abridgment of binding contracts (GM Bonds).
Refusal to stop civil unrest by simply verifying that Obama is eligible.
Refusal to strike down Congress’s Ex Post Facto AND bill of attainder action on AIG/TARP Bonus taxation.

Hm, how much more proof do we need that the USSC doesn’t do its job (care about the Constitution)?


9 posted on 08/19/2009 8:22:36 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charlie72

Since the Washington fools have trashed and buried our Constitution (No doubt in the same hole as Obomba’s birth certificate) and have worked overtime to prove that America’s form of government doesn’t work for the people, it’s time for Change We Can Believe In!


10 posted on 08/19/2009 8:23:17 AM PDT by IbJensen (If Caltholic voters were true to their faith there would be no abortion and no President Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
...and there are 40 plus ‘czars” who are making policy,...

Please. Refer to them by their official title: commissar.

11 posted on 08/19/2009 8:24:49 AM PDT by IbJensen (If Caltholic voters were true to their faith there would be no abortion and no President Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: charlie72

Oh, and by the way Charlie, even when posting a vanity post try to sort out your comments with paragraphs. Otherwise, just read and keep quiet.


12 posted on 08/19/2009 8:25:58 AM PDT by IbJensen (If Caltholic voters were true to their faith there would be no abortion and no President Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charlie72
charlie72
Since Aug 9, 2009

Welcome to FR ...
13 posted on 08/19/2009 8:32:46 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I tried to arrange paragraphs, but for some reason it did not work this time. You can always skip it and not read.


14 posted on 08/19/2009 3:07:00 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Twofortea

Socialism is a giant dragon. Rather than keep chopping at its tail, we must cut off the head LEGALLY in order to stop all the other mess coming the next three years. You have the right to skip what you don’t want to read.


15 posted on 08/19/2009 3:09:28 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

See TexasHillCountryBlog.blogspot.com/2008/11/scotus-requires-obama-to-show-birth.html

Others say Souter balked at being told to go along with martial law if Obama decided it was necessary.


16 posted on 08/19/2009 3:38:40 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Thank you. Yes, like Nixon saying he was not a crook, people need to know their president is not a communist. (sarcasm)


17 posted on 08/19/2009 3:41:29 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

See post 16.


18 posted on 08/19/2009 3:43:56 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: charlie72
See TexasHillCountryBlog.blogspot.com/2008/11/scotus-requires-obama-to-show-birth.html

A blog that doesn't seem to be available anymore and an unknown 'others'. How can we argue with that?

19 posted on 08/19/2009 4:50:08 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

It looks like it moved to TexasHillblog.wordpress.com.
Also check freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2128383/posts

Sorry about the problems. It came out on Nov. 8, ‘08.
To find it I googled “justice souter demands obama produce birth certificate” and the second listing was TexasHillBlog.wordpress.com.
The fourth listing was the free republic.


20 posted on 08/19/2009 6:42:25 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson