Posted on 09/01/2009 6:09:18 PM PDT by hecht
FORT WORTH, Texas (AP) - A nurse's aide hit a homeless man with her car, drove home with him stuck headfirst in her broken windshield, and ignored his cries for help as he bled to death in her garage over the next two or three days, police say.
One of the most disturbing features of the story is that the nurse's aide, Chante Mallard, told police she periodically went into the garage to apologize to the man for hitting him and leaving him to die in her windshield. Someone had taught her, no doubt, that if you do something bad you should apologize, thus accepting responsibility.
Philosophers and pundits like to rant in the teeth of modernity that no one takes responsibility for anything anymore. William Bennett, for example, has made a career of bemoaning our era and our former president on these grounds.
But it's always been hard to take responsibility for something bad. The first impulse really is to lie or say nothing, to be invisible to moral radar with your stealth technology. I don't know Chante Mallard, but I picture her letting the man bleed and starve in her garage because she didn't want to get into trouble. It was a lie of silence.
When philosophers discuss good and evil, they often do it, as Aristotle did, in terms of virtues such as courage or temperance. Others, called utilitarians, say that you must relieve as much suffering and cause as much pleasure as possible. Yet others, such as Immanuel, Kant, say that you must do what it is in accordance with duty or a moral law that ultimately has its origin in God.
No doubt Chante Mallard fails on all counts. But the various theories, though they can condemn her, don't explain exactly what is wrong with Mallard. The best way to say what Mallard did is to say that she couldn't face or tell the truth: that you yourself did something wrong or harmful.
It is easy to predict that when Chante Mallard stands trial for murder, she will plead insanity and enumerate a variety of psychological problems. When finally arrested, she told police that she had been drinking and taking ecstasy. The drinking and drugs are likely to figure in her defense. Then she'll be claiming ''diminished responsibility'' on the grounds that her mental state did not allow her to fully intend her action, or that she could not understand her action's moral implications. That goes for her friends, too, who helped her dump the body.
But perhaps responsibility does not actually require sanity. Perhaps we are responsible for what we do no matter what our state of mind at the time. Perhaps all responsibility asserts is that the actions we take are our own actions. Perhaps taking responsibility - on the trivial level that my son needed to or on the monstrous level that Chante Mallard needs to - is saying the horrible truth and taking the consequences.
Crispin Sartwell teaches ethics at the Maryland Institute College of Art.
Wasn’t that a movie “Stuck”?
Better yet, she should run for Senate in Massachusetts
Wasn’t that about 10yrs ago?
yes, she went to jail and he remained in the Senate
Yes, I remember.
Yes
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.