[Tainan]

Naturalman1975 is presenting valid and substantial information in this matter. He has carried his points well and true in the face of repeated examination and questioning. This childish name-calling and useless insults are uncalled for and less than civil.
He is a good-guy, as his record attests, and while discussion and critique of his points should be SOP; the rude comments reflect an insecurity and lack of ability that really should be kept to ones self rather than trotted out for public display.
Unity is our strength.

[MHGinTN]

You apparently missed the long thread where the idiocy of the Bomford fraud was exposed. Here’s a clue: when lettering is superposed over folds of the background paper but the lettering is not deformed in any way, the exhibit is a fabrication, not valid; when the signature has the printing of the form upon which the signature was supposedly written, the exhibit is a fraud. When you catch up, come back and tell us what an upfront guy the poster is, trying to peddle garbage not even about the post he addressed.