Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae

No, it is very UNLIKELY that he was a British Citizen if born in the US as Obama Sr was already married and could not legally marry Ann.


80 posted on 09/21/2009 6:34:07 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

Heritage is not determined by Marital Status.


82 posted on 09/21/2009 6:37:28 PM PDT by Danae (No political party should pick candidates. That's the voters job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
No, it is very UNLIKELY that he was a British Citizen if born in the US as Obama Sr was already married and could not legally marry Ann.

That may or may not matter. It's not that he, BHO Jr, was a British Citizen at birth, but rather that his father was not a US citizen. If BHO Sr was listed on the original BC as the father, even if they weren't married, he's legally the father. Of course because he was, under this assumption, born in the US, little BHO was a citizen at birth, but likely not natural born. Same if he was born outside the US, he'd be a citizen, if his parents weren't legally married, but not natural born, because it's a statue that makes him a citizen in that case. If born outside the US, and parents married, the statue makes him not a citizen at all, because Stanley Ann failed the US residency test, which as you know, is different if the mother is married than if she is not.

176 posted on 09/21/2009 9:49:14 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson